/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Apple will be bigger than IBM

Arguably two of America's best run companies are Apple Inc (NASDAQ: AAPL) and International Business Machines (NYSE: IBM).  Both have achieved high levels of success and shareholders have been rewarded along the way.  However, both are treading in different waters …

Apple Inc (AAPL): BloggingStocks Georges Yared

Context & Ripple Effects

This projection lands at a hinge moment for Apple: the FCC cleared the iPhone for sale on May 17, 2007, and the device is due in stores next month, giving the company its first real shot at mass-market scale beyond the Mac and iPod. Days earlier, IBM countered with a headline of its own — the 65nm POWER6 processor running at 4.7GHz — a reminder that its growth engine runs through enterprise servers, a market Apple does not touch.

BloggingStocks frames both firms as among America's best-run companies whose shareholders have been rewarded, but argues they are treading in different waters. Read that way, the size comparison is less a forecast than a bet on which water rises faster: consumer device volume or enterprise hardware contracts.

First-order effects

  • Apple's valuation case now hinges on the iPhone, FCC-approved and shipping next month — the first product where its size depends on mass-market volume rather than premium Mac and iPod niches.
  • IBM's answer to the same question is silicon: the 4.7GHz POWER6 announcement underscores that its scale story is sold to data centers and enterprises, not consumers.

Second-order effects

  • If the bigger-than-IBM thesis gains traction, investors have to price Apple on consumer-device volume instead of niche hardware margins, while IBM's multiple stays tethered to enterprise hardware upgrade cycles.
  • Unconfirmed reports that Apple may open the iPhone to prepaid users suggest the company is weighing broader carrier distribution to reach the volumes a comparison with IBM would require.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, market-cap leadership in American tech shifts from companies selling to enterprises to companies selling ecosystems to consumers — a re-ranking by end-user reach rather than contract size.
  • The divergence also sets up a structural question for both camps: whether an enterprise incumbent can defend its valuation against a consumer platform whose growth compounds through retail channels IBM has no presence in.

The trend: Consumer device ecosystems are positioned to overtake enterprise IT incumbents in market value, with the iPhone's June 2007 launch serving as the first hard test of that re-ranking.