/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Origami 2.0 to be thinner, smaller, and (maybe) less expensive

Microsoft is working on a new set of specifications for its Origami project.  Microsoft development manager Vikram Madan spoke this week at the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference in Los Angeles about some of the specs …

Ars Technica Jacqui Cheng

Context & Ripple Effects

Origami has been on the defensive since The Inquirer branded the first generation of UMPCs a disaster in June 2006, so Vikram Madan's announcement of a revised specification set at WinHEC reads as a deliberate reset: thinner, smaller, and possibly cheaper hardware targets meant to fix what buyers rejected the first time.

The stakes sit with Microsoft's OEM partners more than with Microsoft itself — a spec sheet only matters if manufacturers commit second-generation designs against it, and the weak 2006 sell-through gave them every reason to walk away instead.

First-order effects

  • Microsoft's OEM partners now have concrete Origami 2.0 targets to design against, making the decision to fund a second-generation device explicit rather than open-ended.
  • Madan's 'maybe less expensive' framing acknowledges that first-gen pricing was part of the failure mode, putting cost reduction on the same footing as size and weight in the spec.

Second-order effects

  • Thinner and cheaper UMPCs push the category toward overlap with subnotebooks and handhelds, forcing OEMs to justify a third device class between laptop and phone rather than compete within either.
  • If the revised specs still don't move units, Microsoft faces pressure to subsidize the category itself or fold Origami's goals into other product lines rather than keep issuing spec revisions.

Third-order effects

  • The pattern here — Microsoft defining a hardware class through published specifications and iterating after a commercial stumble — tests whether spec-driven platform leadership can sustain a category that consumers haven't asked for.
  • If Origami 2.0 succeeds in shrinking the touch-first PC, the long-run direction points toward pocketable, pen-and-touch Windows devices converging with phones, a structural shift in where Microsoft's OS lives.

The trend: Microsoft is treating the UMPC as a persistent platform bet, using successive Origami specification revisions to chase a touch-first PC form factor that the market hasn't yet embraced.