/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Popfly - Mashup the web with Silverlight

Disclosure: This morning I announced that I'm working for Adobe.  While I haven't officially started, consider me an Adobe employee for all intents and purposes.  I have the disclosure statement at the bottom of the page, but I'll probably run …

The Universal Desktop Ryan Stewart

Context & Ripple Effects

Microsoft's Popfly launch lands mid-escalation in the rich-client runtime war: two days earlier the same corpus was mapping Apollo against Silverlight point by point, and in March GigaOM framed Apollo versus Firefox as an emerging battle for hybrid web/desktop apps. Sun had already positioned itself against both runtimes in May, so Popfly reads as Microsoft's answer to Apollo's public alpha — aimed at consumers rather than developers.

The story traveled unusually far for a beta announcement: TechCrunch, CNET, MSDN Blogs and Channel 9 all picked it up the same day, which tells you how much attention the Silverlight-versus-Flash question commanded at that moment. The wrinkle is the source itself — The Universal Desktop's author opens the post by disclosing he has accepted a position at Adobe, meaning one of the more-watched voices on the Apollo/Silverlight contest now sits on Adobe's payroll while writing about its chief rival's launch.

First-order effects

  • Microsoft gains a consumer-friendly showcase for Silverlight at exactly the moment Adobe's Apollo alpha is courting Flash and Ajax developers, giving each runtime a flagship demo to argue with.
  • The disclosing author's credibility as an independent analyst of the Adobe-Microsoft runtime fight is immediately compromised — readers must now weigh his Silverlight coverage knowing he considers himself an Adobe employee.

Second-order effects

  • Adobe faces pressure to counter Popfly's drag-and-drop mashup pitch with something comparably approachable on Apollo, since Popfly demonstrates that the runtime war will be fought over end-user creation tools, not just developer frameworks.
  • Microsoft gets a distribution argument inside enterprises where SharePoint already lives — a natural bundling path for a mashup builder built on its own runtime.

Third-order effects

  • If consumer-accessible mashup builders prove out, application creation shifts further toward non-programmers, making the underlying runtime — Silverlight or Apollo/Flash — the strategic chokepoint rather than any single tool.
  • Disclosure norms for industry bloggers become harder to ignore: as vendors hire the most influential commentators, coverage of platform wars increasingly doubles as advocacy, pushing readers toward corporate-published channels like MSDN for primary claims.

The trend: The browser-plugin wars of 2007 are being fought through consumer-facing creation tools — Popfly for Silverlight against Apollo's Flash-based stack — as Microsoft and Adobe compete to own both the runtime and the audience that builds on it.