/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Growth of Twitter vs. Blogger

Further update: The Twitter data is bad, bad, bad, rendering Andy's post and most of this here post useless.  Both jumps in Twitter activity in Nov 2006 and March 2007 are artificial in nature.  See here for an update.  —  Update: A commenter noted …

kottke.org

Context & Ripple Effects

Measuring new publishing services by their growth curves was established practice before this post: Sifry's Alerts had been charting blogosphere expansion since its February 2006 state-of-the-blogosphere analysis, setting the template Kottke applies here by plotting Twitter against Blogger.

The post matters because it breaks that template mid-application. Days after Twitter opened its m.twitter.com mobile web interface in early May 2007 — and two months after Twitter and Dodgeball emerged as the flaunted rival social-messaging services at SXSW 2007 — Kottke concludes that both visible jumps in Twitter activity (November 2006 and March 2007) are artificial, discrediting his own comparison and Andy's underlying post.

First-order effects

  • Kottke's own Twitter-vs-Blogger comparison and Andy's post are rendered useless: the November 2006 and March 2007 activity spikes were artifacts, so anyone citing those curves is working from bad data.
  • With third-party measurement discredited, judgments about whether Twitter's rise is real fall back on anecdotes like its SXSW 2007 visibility rather than on charts.

Second-order effects

  • The burden of credible growth numbers shifts toward first-party disclosure — whoever publishes reliable usage stats controls the Twitter-versus-incumbents narrative that bloggers and analysts are actively trying to write.
  • Comparisons between Twitter and Dodgeball, and between microblogging and blogging generally, become contested precisely because no trusted instrument exists yet for the newer service.

Third-order effects

  • If adoption of fast-growing consumer services keeps outrunning the tools that measure it, the blog-era habit of tracking growth through open public data gives way to platform-published statistics — a structural change in who arbitrates growth claims.

The trend: Microblogging's growth is being measured with blogging-era instruments that are failing under it, pushing adoption narratives from open data toward whatever metrics platforms themselves disclose.