/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Inside the Lucasfilm data center

SAN FRANCISCO—Given the cult-film status of 1971's THX 1138 in the George Lucas universe, it should come as little surprise that the total capacity of Lucasfilm's giant data center is 11.38 petabits per second.  —  Granted, that number …

CNET News.com Daniel Terdiman

Context & Ripple Effects

CNET's tour of Lucasfilm's machine room reads less like film trivia than like a network-build spec sheet: a 10,000-square-foot floor carrying more than 300 ten-gigabit ports, capped at 11.38 petabits per second — a deliberate homage by George Lucas's team to his 1971 cult film THX 1138.

Where the story went matters as much as what it says: its pickup by theWHIR, a web-hosting trade outlet, shows infrastructure readers treating a movie studio's internal facility as a benchmark for how large fabrics get designed and branded.

First-order effects

  • Industrial Light & Magic's rendering throughput is now constrained by network capacity as much as by server count, since the 11.38-petabit fabric has to shuttle frames across hundreds of ten-gigabit links simultaneously.
  • Competing visual-effects houses get a rare published reference point for what blockbuster-scale studio infrastructure looks like, letting them benchmark their own builds against Lucasfilm's numbers.

Second-order effects

  • Rival studios face pressure to disclose or match comparable compute-and-network specs, because ILM's publicized capacity sets a visible bar for what effects-heavy productions demand of their backers.
  • Network-equipment vendors gain a marquee named customer whose facility doubles as marketing collateral in the data-center market.

Third-order effects

  • If studios keep building at this scale, entertainment companies converge on the same large-fabric data-center designs driving high-performance computing, blurring the line between film-production IT and enterprise HPC.
  • Facility branding as fan service — the THX 1138 figure — points toward infrastructure becoming part of a studio's public identity rather than back-office secrecy.

The trend: Movie studios are turning render-farm back ends into flagship data-center builds whose scale and design choices double as competitive signaling in both film production and the infrastructure trade.