/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

SlingCatcher Is Real!

A few months back, I stumbled upon some patent applications by the Krikorian brothers (AKA Sling Media founders and execs) that alluded to a device designed to receive broadcasts — as opposed to the Slingbox which broadcasts your home television signals.

Zatz Not Funny! Dave Zatz

Context & Ripple Effects

The Slingbox story until now has run one way: the Krikorian brothers' box sends a home TV signal out over the internet to a viewer elsewhere. Patent filings by Blake and Jason Krikorian flagged months ago that a reverse device existed, and Sling Media has now confirmed it ahead of CES 2007 — a receiver built to accept broadcasts rather than transmit them.

The pickup matters beyond one gadget: GigaOM frames the SlingCatcher as Sling entering the PC-to-TV bridge category outright, and Reuters' interview coverage of Sling's chief signals the announcement traveled well past gadget blogs into mainstream business press.

First-order effects

  • Sling Media's product line becomes a two-way chain: the Slingbox sends a home signal out, and the confirmed SlingCatcher receives streams back onto televisions that have no PC attached.
  • The Krikorians move from defending patents around the concept to shipping against it, converting filing-stage IP into a public product commitment at CES.

Second-order effects

  • Rivals in the nascent PC-to-TV bridge market now face Sling arriving with an installed base of Slingbox owners who already generate the streams its catcher is designed to display.
  • TV makers and set-top vendors lose part of the 'second room' argument: a cheap receiver box can pull place-shifted video onto any existing television, undercutting hardware upgrades sold on that basis.

Third-order effects

  • If the send-and-receive pairing holds, television viewing starts decoupling from the broadcast schedule and the set-top box, with internet-delivered streams terminating on commodity living-room receivers rather than operator-supplied hardware.
  • The pattern points toward place-shifting firms becoming two-sided platforms — controlling both ends of the video path — which positions them for carriage-style deals with content owners whose rights regimes currently assume one fixed receiver per home.

The trend: Place-shifting companies are reversing the direction of their pipes, from pushing home TV out to the world to pulling networked video onto the living-room screen.