/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

PayPerPost In The News Again

PayPerPost, the controversial startup that pays bloggers to write about advertisers' products, will be in the news again tomorrow.  They will be announcing the acquisition of blogging tools and services company Performancing (see our earlier coverage of Performancing).

TechCrunch Michael Arrington

Context & Ripple Effects

PayPerPost has spent 2006 as the most polarizing company in blog advertising: the startup pays bloggers directly to write about advertisers' products, a model Robert Scoble publicly rejected six months ago unless writers disclose the arrangement (his stated conditions for ever using it). The controversy is not incidental — disclosure, or the lack of it, is the core criticism of the business.

The acquisition target brings an awkward pairing of assets. Performancing built blogging tools and services, and as far back as December 2005 its people were talking with John Battelle about how independent publishing networks like FM Publishing could work (that conversation about publisher economics). Folding those tools into a paid-posting marketplace puts PayPerPost closer to the bloggers themselves — their workflow, not just their posts.

First-order effects

  • Bloggers using Performancing's tools now sit inside a company whose revenue depends on sponsored posts, so every future product decision trades off tool credibility against marketplace growth.
  • PayPerPost gains distribution and legitimacy signals from owning established blogging software rather than only the controversial posting service.

Second-order effects

  • Rivals in blog monetization — ad networks and sponsored-content marketplaces — are pushed toward tool acquisitions of their own or clearer disclosure policies to distinguish themselves from PayPerPost's reputation.
  • The disclosure fight sharpens: critics like Scobleizer now argue against a company that owns infrastructure bloggers rely on, raising the stakes of the disclosure-versus-undeclared-advertising question across the medium.

Third-order effects

  • If pay-for-posts spreads through owned tools and platforms, the line between editorial and advertising in blogs erodes structurally, making formal disclosure rules — voluntary codes or regulator intervention — more likely than platform-by-platform discretion.
  • Blogging shifts from a reader-funded or ad-network-funded medium toward direct advertiser-to-writer payment, with whoever controls the tools controlling the terms of that payment.

The trend: Blog monetization is moving from indirect ad networks toward direct advertiser-to-blogger payments, with disclosure norms lagging behind the deals that force the question.