/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

BizDev 2.0

When another blogger notices something you said, and points out its blogworthiness, the temptation is strong to scoop them.  And so I'm scooping Fred, who contacted me about a small startup that wanted an introduction, but I said we (that is, Flickr) probably didn't have the space …

Caterina.net Caterina

Context & Ripple Effects

Caterina Fake's post is a deliberate scoop of Fred himself: he approached her about brokering an introduction between a small startup and Flickr, and she is publishing the exchange before he can. The syndicated pickup on A VC the same day means both ends of the introduction told the story at once — the connector declining and the would-be broker scooped on his own channel.

Her stated reason, that Flickr "probably didn't have the space," reads less like a brush-off than an operational fact in summer 2006: weeks earlier Flickr had disclosed a temporary storage failure hitting old photos and was moving roughly 20 terabytes of images between data centers to restore consistency, all while riding a traffic curve that had already overtaken Webshots per Alexa the previous November.

First-order effects

  • The unnamed startup loses a warm path into Flickr through two of the most-read voices in its orbit, and learns its pitch will be adjudicated publicly on blogs rather than privately over email.
  • Flickr converts scarce engineering and ops bandwidth into an explicit deal-flow filter: during the 20TB migration and post-failure cleanup, inbound partnerships get declined on capacity, not merit.

Second-order effects

  • Fred publishing the approach anyway turns A VC into a de facto public deal-flow board — other founders can see that a blogger introduction is legible, quotable, and fast, so they route pitches through attention-rich bloggers instead of corporate BD departments.
  • For startups, the cost of being passed over drops: a public mention by a connected blogger functions as marketing even when the target company says no, softening the downside of a rejected intro.

Third-order effects

  • If introductions increasingly happen in public on blogs, business development migrates from conference-and-contact pipelines toward reputation-weighted matching where the intermediary's audience size is the asset — the "2.0" in the title is that structural claim.
  • Capacity-constrained winners like Flickr face a standing incentive to productize inbound interest (APIs, self-serve channels) so that scarcity stops gating every deal individually — otherwise the bottleneck simply moves to whoever controls access.

The trend: Deal flow in the mid-2000s web industry is migrating out of private BD channels and into the blog network, where well-connected bloggers act as public matchmakers between startups and platform companies.