/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Kool IM Launches to Battle Meebo

Michigan based Kool IM, an Ajax web chat service that compares to Meebo and eBuddy, launched today.  —  These services are very popular, particularly with employees and students who are unable to download and use normal IM clients on their computers.

TechCrunch Michael Arrington

Context & Ripple Effects

Meebo entered this market with funding and a clear pitch: an Ajax take on the Trillian multi-network client, a few million dollars in the bank as of late 2005. eBuddy is already serving the same need, so Kool IM is launching into a category that now has at least three named players.

The shared customer is defined by constraint rather than preference: employees and students whose networks block downloadable IM clients, making the browser the only legal endpoint. That constraint is the whole addressable market, and it is why a Michigan two-person-scale launch can even register against funded incumbents.

First-order effects

  • Meebo and eBuddy immediately face a third competitor chasing the same network-restricted user base, where switching costs between web clients are near zero.
  • Kool IM must win users on client quality alone since it launches with no disclosed funding or distribution advantage over its rivals.

Second-order effects

  • With core multi-network chat commoditized across Meebo, eBuddy, and now Kool IM, the funded incumbents are pushed to differentiate on features beyond plain messaging to justify their capital.
  • IT administrators and schools — the gatekeepers creating this market by blocking desktop clients — gain nothing from any of the services, meaning the arms race stays focused on evading detection rather than serving buyers.

Third-order effects

  • If browser-delivered apps keep substituting for installable software wherever administrators restrict installs, enterprise IT policy becomes a product-distribution channel in itself — determining which consumer software categories migrate to the web.
  • A field of near-identical Ajax chat clients points toward consolidation or platform expansion, since undifferentiated aggregators rarely all survive once the underlying networks change their terms.

The trend: Consumer software is migrating into the browser not because the web is better but because locked-down networks make it the only channel — turning IT restrictions into a market-maker for Ajax startups.