/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

SAP Gets On-Demand Religion

At last, Europe's biggest software maker is making a tentative — too tentative? — push into the on-demand CRM market occupied by rivals  —  Marc Benioff, the boisterous boss of Salesforce.com (CRM), has been heralding the end of software as we know it ever since …

Business Week Steve Hamm

Context & Ripple Effects

Europe's biggest software maker has spent years watching Marc Benioff campaign for "the end of software as we know it" while Salesforce.com built a hosted CRM franchise on his home turf. With this report, SAP finally answers — confirmed as a push into the on-demand CRM market Salesforce occupies, though Business Week frames it as tentative and openly asks whether it is too much so.

First-order effects

  • Salesforce.com now faces direct competition in hosted CRM from an incumbent with far deeper balance-sheet resources and an installed enterprise base to cross-sell into.
  • SAP has to sell a subscription product inside a business model whose economics rest on upfront licenses and maintenance — a conflict the report itself flags via the "too tentative" framing.

Second-order effects

  • A credible on-demand entrant gives enterprise CRM buyers negotiating leverage against Salesforce.com just as Benioff's rhetoric shifts from challenger talk to defending an occupied market.
  • The move pressures SAP's own license-and-maintenance franchise: every on-demand seat sold cannibalizes the packaged model, forcing internal clarity on which revenue stream it is protecting.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds — incumbents following the challenger rather than leading — enterprise application delivery drifts structurally toward subscriptions, with the vendor who commits earliest setting the price and switching-cost terms for everyone else.

The trend: Enterprise software is migrating from perpetual licenses toward on-demand subscriptions, with incumbent vendors like SAP entering only once a challenger such as Salesforce.com has proven the model.