/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

European police say Binance's April 2025 policy asking law enforcement to route certain requests to foreign government agencies hinders criminal investigations

Investigators in Europe said that the cryptocurrency giant Binance had made it more difficult to track down scammers and solve other crimes.

New York Times

Context & Ripple Effects

European investigators’ complaint extends a long-running compliance narrative around Binance. Earlier reporting found the exchange withheld information from regulators while maintaining weak customer checks, while U.S. scrutiny had already broadened across several enforcement fronts.

The issue is now operational rather than only regulatory: a policy governing where police must send requests can determine how quickly investigators can trace suspected criminal activity. Binance disputes that it changed its practices or added freeze requirements.

First-order effects

  • European police agencies face additional routing steps for certain Binance information requests, which they say delays scam and other criminal investigations.
  • Binance’s law-enforcement cooperation procedures become a fresh point of contention with European authorities, alongside its contested MiCA licensing efforts.

Second-order effects

  • Delays in obtaining exchange records can increase pressure on investigators to use alternative channels and on Binance to demonstrate that its request-handling process does not impede active cases.
  • The complaint reinforces regulators’ focus on whether exchanges’ stated compliance commitments translate into usable cooperation in practice, echoing the earlier expectation of penalties to resolve U.S. investigations.

Third-order effects

  • If authorities increasingly treat cross-border request routing as an enforcement obstacle, crypto platforms may face more standardized expectations for direct, timely law-enforcement access.
  • The episode fits a broader test of whether major exchanges can close the gap between compliance claims and regulator access, a factor in crypto’s institutional legitimacy.

The trend: Crypto regulation is shifting from assessing written controls to testing whether platforms’ operational processes enable effective enforcement across borders.

Discussion

  • @leomschwartz Leo Schwartz on x
    Interesting reporting from the NYT today on Binance's new relationship with global police that follows on from my article earlier this month https://www.nytimes.com/...
  • Mike Forsythe Mike Forsythe on linkedin
    We just published an article that takes a close look at how a new policy at Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange and a business partner …