Sources: Reddit, Politico, and others weigh cutting Google's access to their content for AI as traffic drops; Reddit signed a $60M/year deal with Google in 2024
Reddit, Politico and others are weighing how—or even if—they can work with the tech company as AI tools supplant traditional searches
Wall Street JournalAlexandra Bruell
Context & Ripple Effects
Reddit’s reconsideration tests the durability of its earlier reported $60 million-a-year arrangement with Google, which paired Search visibility with access to Reddit data for AI uses. Politico’s inclusion suggests the question is extending beyond a single platform’s licensing strategy.
The dispute follows Reddit’s earlier apparent restriction of non-Google search crawlers, underscoring how publishers can differentiate access among search and AI distribution partners as referral value changes.
First-order effects
Reddit, Politico, and other publishers may reassess or narrow the terms under which Google can use their material for AI, putting existing access arrangements under pressure.
Google faces a more contested supply relationship with publishers whose content helps support its search and AI products, even where commercial agreements already exist.
Second-order effects
Publishers negotiating AI licenses gain a clearer incentive to separate payment for content access from the traffic value they receive, rather than treating search exposure as sufficient consideration.
Other search and AI providers may face renewed demands for clearer crawling, training, and referral terms, particularly from publishers able to restrict access.
Third-order effects
If publishers increasingly tie AI access to measurable distribution outcomes, content licensing could shift from broad platform partnerships toward more conditional, revocable agreements.
The episode points to publisher control over AI-search access becoming a competitive lever: platforms that cannot sustain referral relationships may need to pay more or operate with less current source material.
The trend: AI search is turning publisher content from a traffic-acquisition input into a separately negotiated, strategically controlled resource.
good, important story. google has not enunciated why any publishers should continue to work with them even as they throw a pittance with footnote-level links in the AI summaries at the top the partnerships teams are basically a fig leaf on a coming storm https://www.wsj.com/...
the value exchange for publishers for most of google's existence was a two way street: links for traffic. it's why everyone allowed robots dot txt to index the internet now, to keep apace with rivals, google's end is primarily value extractive. whats the payoff for publishers? [i…
“a growing chorus of online media companies expressing frustration with the tech giant as AI changes the way people ask questions, siphons off search traffic and upends publishers' revenue models” @alexbruell https://www.wsj.com/...
Major publishers are considering blocking Google from their content including USA Today, Reuters, People Inc (including Better Homes & Garden). Google traffic to some publishers are down 50% YoY! Now, only 25% of traffic to People Inc. is from Google 🤯 https://www.wsj.com/...
The proliferation of generative AI in search is upending the economy of the internet. Now news publishers are asking themselves: Is Google search worth it anymore? …
Publishers used to grumble privately about how powerful Google was, but maintain the relationship because the search engine sent so much traffic their way. …
Reddit, Reuters, and Politico are all considering cutting off Google, which is probably the right move as Google races away from the open web — www.wsj.com/business/med...