/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

AI adoption follows the J-curve path of general-purpose tech, like early US factory electrification, requiring years of investment before noticeable ROI gains

Exponential View

Discussion

  • @pmarca Marc Andreessen on x
    Many people are saying.
  • @azeem Azeem Azhar on x
    You won't get ROI from AI by giving everyone a chatbot and leaving the company unchanged.
  • @chrishayduk Chris Hayduk on x
    GPTs are GPTs, and deploying them in a way that maximizes productivity growth is highly non-trivial This is the exact idea behind the FDE team at OpenAI - we aim to drive maximum possible returns for our clients by reimagining workflows from the ground up with agents in mind
  • @dropalltables Kevin Patrick Mahaffey on x
    Invention and diffusion are separate concepts. We will have 10-20 years of work to realize the benefits of the AI that's already here. It won't be overnight. Spending a bunch of money on tokens does not a process re-engineer.
  • @azeem Azeem Azhar on x
    A general-purpose technology can sit inside firms for ages before we see the results. It happened with electricity, it's happening with AI. [image]
  • @sarthakgh Sar Haribhakti on x
    “Erik Brynjolfsson calls this the productivity J-curve: general-purpose technologies are a drag in their early years because firms have to make complementary intangible investments before the gains materialize.” [image]
  • @danshipper Dan Shipper on x
    Extremely smart take on the tokenmaxxing panic and why it won't last:
  • @shreyasd Shreyas on bluesky
    What is the curve called which just keeps dipping?  —  How many technologies have not followed J curve?  —  Any statistics?
  • @disabilitystor1 Aparna Nair on bluesky
    There is no other industry, surely, where this mealy mouthed paragraph, void of any real measure, is presented as proof of ‘value’ and/or success? [embedded post]
  • @bwnash Brian on bluesky
    Meanwhile, tensor processors are on a 3 year depreciation schedule and are nearly 40% of data center costs.  Tick tock!  —  My heart will burst with joy if adoption takes so long, the worst humans ever to live lose absolutely existential amounts of money, and the infrastructure h…
  • @edzitron.com Ed Zitron on bluesky
    How many of these fucked up apologia pieces are we going to get before they give up [embedded post]
  • @notthatadamlevine Adam Levine on bluesky
    PC productivity gains didn't show up until the mid-90s.  Don't expect this to be different.  [embedded post]