Google's keyword ad practices face renewed criticism after the Delhi High Court ruled against Google in a trademark dispute involving Indian company Hindware
TechCrunchJagmeet Singh
Context & Ripple Effects
The ruling lands in a long-running Indian record of challenges to Google’s control over search and advertising. India’s antitrust regulator previously fined Google over search and search-advertising conduct, and later opened investigations tied to billing and news-aggregation complaints.
India has also become a more important market for Google’s advertising products, including recently launched AI ad tools. That makes the treatment of brand terms in search ads consequential for both advertisers and the platform’s local growth strategy.
First-order effects
Google must contend with an adverse Delhi High Court outcome in its dispute with Hindware, adding legal pressure around how its keyword-ad system handles trademarks.
Hindware gains a court-backed position in its dispute with Google, while other trademark owners have a fresh reference point for challenging similar ad placements.
Second-order effects
The decision can strengthen complainants’ arguments that keyword-ad design deserves scrutiny alongside Google’s already contested search and advertising practices in India.
Advertisers and brand owners may push more actively for clearer controls or enforcement around trademark-linked keywords, increasing operational and legal scrutiny of Google’s ad marketplace.
Third-order effects
If courts and regulators continue to treat search-ad practices as a competition and trademark issue, Google may face more market-specific constraints on ad-product policies rather than relying on uniform global rules.
The case fits a broader shift in which dominant digital platforms’ ad systems are assessed not only for efficiency, but also for how platform rules allocate visibility and brand protection among businesses.
The trend: India’s growing importance to global ad platforms is being matched by more intensive judicial and regulatory scrutiny of the rules governing their marketplaces.
I am with Nithin on this. What Google was doing was completely unethical and I am glad it has been found illegal in India. They need to be held to account for these shady business practices.
The Delhi High Court just ruled against Google in a trademark case that every Indian founder needs to know about!! Hindware sued because searches for “Hindware” returned competitor ads - Cera, Grohe, above their own listing. Customers looking specifically for Hindware were being
In a landmark judgment on May 22, 2026, the Delhi High Court held Google liable for trademark infringement. The case was between Hindware and Google. The court held that, by allowing competitors of Hindware to purchase the keyword “Hindware” (a trademarked name) through Google
Indian businesses today are rejoicing a ruling against Google Google infringed the trademark rights of an Indian bathroom fittings maker by allowing rivals to use its name as an ad keyword, a decision that is seen reshaping the online ads market https://www.reuters.com/...
🚨Why Delhi HC's Hindware ruling could trigger a rethink in India's Rs 1 lakh crore ad market “Every time someone typed ‘Hindware’ into a search bar, Google sold that moment—not the word, but the intent—to Hindware's competitors,” said Sonam Bhagat, Founder and CEO of Vygr
The Delhi High Court's reasoning hinged on three specific factors: Hindware being a coined mark rather than a generic term, its well-known trademark status, and Google's alleged active role in suggesting and auctioning the term through its Keyword Planner. “Remove any one of
Hindware took Google to court & won. Rivals can no longer bid on its trademark, intercepting search results for Hindware with Cera, Grohe, et al, rules Delhi High Court. Google had argued that it was a neutral intermediary, with safe harbor protection under Section 79 of India's