/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

The persistent idea that AI disruption could create a permanent underclass signals how much collateral damage AI companies will tolerate in their pursuit of AGI

Most people I know in the A.I. industry think the median person is screwed, and they have no idea what to do about it.

New York Times Jasmine Sun

Discussion

  • @chaykak Kyle Chayka on x
    Will AI trap you in the “permanent underclass”? my column from last year https://www.newyorker.com/...
  • @almostmedia Julie Fredrickson on x
    I think Jasmine is one of the most talented writers of her generation but this is a fantasyland where both classist obsessives & the precariat are being used to create a panic to extract resources which may well kill the emerging technologies that bring positive sum change
  • @jasminewsun Jasmine Sun on x
    Most people I know in AI think the median person is screwed, and they have no idea what to do about it. I spent the last 3 months talking to dozens of researchers, economists, and policy experts about AI's impact on work; including reps from every frontier lab and several [image]
  • @afinetheorem Kevin A. Bryan on x
    Nice work by Jasmine but...economists by and large don't expect a permanent underclass. You see that in our survey she links, but also 1) productivity high correlated w/ wages historically, 2) architectural disruption is slow (where is Waymo in *your* city?), 3) prices adjust 1/2…
  • @noahpinion Noah Smith on x
    It's a problem that most of the people in the AI industry believe that their goal is to make humanity useless, not to give humanity better tools.
  • r/neoliberal r on reddit
    Silicon Valley Is Bracing for a Permanent Underclass
  • @dannygroner Danny Groner on bluesky
    “So while Anthropic employees insist that positive A.I. futures are possible — or else they wouldn't be building it — they often seem uncertain about whether that world is likely, or whether they personally are bringing it about.” www.nytimes.com/2026/04/30/o...
  • r/Economics r on reddit
    Opinion |  Silicon Valley Is Bracing for a Permanent Underclass
  • @sama Sam Altman on x
    we want to build tools to augment and elevate people, not entities to replace them.
  • Ted Dintersmith Ted Dintersmith on linkedin
    So much to take away from this NYT piece.  Whether it happens quickly (3-5 years) or takes a decade, it's inevitable that AI will outperform humans in almost all knowledge-worker tasks. …
  • r/BetterOffline r on reddit
    “Silicon Valley Is Bracing for a Permanent Underclass” NYT Opinion (Gift Link)