Musk v. Altman: the judge told Musk's lawyer she did not want talk of AI's existential threat seeping into the trial, focusing instead on OpenAI's founding
OpenAI's lawyer piped up and both him and Musk's counsel started raising their voices until the judge said they all need to shut up nothing like being dressed down as an adultRat King /@mikeisaac:judge Gonzalez: “I suspect that there are a number of people who do not want to put the future of humanity in Mr. Musk's hands. But we're not going to get into that. This is not a trial on the safety risks of artificial intelligence.”Rat King /@mikeisaac:i am not really sure how often lawyers try to end
lmao — OpenAI's lawyer piped up and both him and Musk's counsel started raising their voices until the judge said they all need to shut up nothing like being dressed down as an adult
judge Gonzalez: “I suspect that there are a number of people who do not want to put the future of humanity in Mr. Musk's hands. But we're not going to get into that. This is not a trial on the safety risks of artificial intelligence.”
i am not really sure how often lawyers try to endear themselves to judges but Musk's lawyer, Steven Molo, does not seem to be trying to do that right now he's trying to get “extinction risk” discussion into the court discussion. “This is a real risk. we all could die.”
Judge cont: “I suspect there are plenty of people who dont want to out the future of humanity in Mr. Musk's hands, but it doesn't matter, we aren't going to get into those issues. We're just not going to do it, and ultimately, it's an advisory opinion. ....This is not a trial on
Intense argument right now between the attorneys (no jury yet) about whether an expert will discuss AI safety risks “WE ALL COULD DIE” Musk's attorney says. Judge isn't having it: “I said stop! ... It is also ironic that your client, despite these risks is creating a company that