/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

An analysis of Internet Archive data: by mid-2025, ~35% of newly published websites since ChatGPT's launch in November 2022 were AI-generated or AI-assisted

Researchers found the internet is becoming aggressively positive as AI-generated text floods the web.

404 Media Matthew Gault

Context & Ripple Effects

Earlier coverage tracked AI text tools moving into books and personalized articles, with fewer clients purchasing human-written work. This analysis supplies a broader measure of how far that supply-side shift has reached across newly published sites.

The related coverage also shows AI retrieval-bot traffic rising at publishers, linking the growth in machine-produced content to a web increasingly mediated by AI systems rather than only conventional site visits.

First-order effects

  • AI-assisted production has become a material part of the new-site supply, giving publishers and site operators a lower-friction way to publish at volume.
  • Human writers and other creators face a larger pool of machine-assisted substitutes, extending the client-pressure described in earlier coverage.

Second-order effects

  • As content supply expands, publishers have stronger incentives to distinguish original work and to manage how AI retrieval systems access and surface it.
  • AI retrieval and answer products gain a larger corpus to process, making distribution through AI interfaces more consequential for publishers than direct page traffic alone.

Third-order effects

  • If this pattern persists, the web’s economics may increasingly separate low-cost content generation from scarce inputs such as trusted sourcing, editorial judgment, and audience distribution.
  • The combination of AI-generated supply and AI-mediated retrieval could intensify pressure for publisher controls over indexing and reuse, though the corpus does not establish which control models will prevail.

The trend: This is part of the industrialization of web content: generative AI is changing both how material is produced and how audiences encounter it.

Discussion

  • @damonberes.com Damon Beres on bluesky
    “Aggressively positive” is indeed exactly how I'm sure everyone feels experiencing the internet these days [embedded post]
  • @knibbs Kate Knibbs on bluesky
    We have lots of anecdotal evidence about what AI does to the internet.  Now we're seeing a new wave of research, including a new paper from Stanford and the Internet Archive that puts the number of AI websites at around 35%—and draws some surprising conclusions: www.wired.com/sto…
  • @mjgault Matthew Gault on bluesky
    AI-generated sites are flooding the internet, swallowing all in their wake
  • @jasonkoebler Jason Koebler on bluesky
    internet for bots by bots www.404media.co/study-finds- ...
  • r/technology r on reddit
    Study finds a third of new websites are AI-generated
  • @rani Rani Molla on bluesky
    The future is now: 35% of newly published websites were AI-generated or AI-assisted last year, up from zero before ChatGPT's launch in late 2022 www.404media.co/study-finds- ...
  • @noahpinion Noah Smith on x
    The Slopocalypse
  • @aisafetymemes @aisafetymemes on x
    Dead Internet Theory update: 1 in 3 websites are now AI-generated Up from ~0 in just ***3 years*** And this is as of mid-2025 - nearly a year ago AIs sucked at coding back then - it could be over 50% now! Soon: 99% “I find the sheer speed of the AI takeover of the web [image]
  • @rmconservative Daniel Horowitz on x
    The implication is that it will increasingly train itself on its own recycled slop.
  • @luizajarovsky Luiza Jarovsky, PhD on x
    🚨 The authors found that, by mid-2025, 35% of newly published websites were AI-generated or AI-assisted (up from zero before ChatGPT's launch). Interesting paper on the impact of AI-generated text on the internet, relying on data from the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine. [imag…
  • @nosilverv @nosilverv on x
    This is EXTREMELY cool and — for people that are tracking my shit — the frontier: whereas before I was tracking mass-produced political language and the effects of that on private reasoning and public discourse the frontier has now moved to mass-produced LLM language
  • @pangramlabs @pangramlabs on x
    We collaborated with researchers at Stanford, Imperial College, and the Internet Archive to investigate public perception of AI's prevalence on the internet. In 2025, 35% of newly published websites on the open internet were AI-generated or AI-assisted. Internet users are [image]