/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

OpenView: by 2025's end, 79 of 500 tracked software companies, like HubSpot, Adobe, and Salesforce, adopted usage-based AI fees, more than double that of 2024

Dozens of enterprise software firms have shifted away from charging customers flat, per-user subscription fees as AI threatens their seat-based pricing model.

The Information

Context & Ripple Effects

Earlier coverage showed enterprise-software vendors struggling to capture much of the initial AI spending, while infrastructure and cloud absorbed more of it. The reported adoption of usage-based AI fees by HubSpot, Adobe, Salesforce, and dozens of peers is a move to connect software revenue more directly to AI consumption.

The surrounding coverage also shows buyers confronting rapidly rising AI bills and adding controls or seeking cheaper models. That makes the pricing shift consequential for both vendors’ unit economics and customers’ procurement behavior.

First-order effects

  • HubSpot, Adobe, Salesforce, and other adopters can charge for AI activity separately from per-user subscriptions, reducing the mismatch between recurring seat revenue and variable AI-serving costs.
  • Customers face AI spend that varies with consumption rather than being fully bundled into license fees, increasing the need to measure and govern usage.

Second-order effects

  • Software buyers are likely to compare AI features on cost per useful task and impose budgets or limits where usage charges rise quickly; vendors must make the value and metering of those features legible.
  • Usage pricing puts greater pressure on model and infrastructure costs: as customers seek cheaper ways to deliver similar work, application vendors have incentives to optimize model selection and AI workloads.

Third-order effects

  • If adoption continues, enterprise-software pricing could become more hybrid: seats for access and workflow, with metered charges for compute-intensive AI actions. That would make AI unit economics a more central product and sales discipline.
  • The shift may also move AI procurement from broad feature adoption toward controlled, measurable deployment, with vendors competing on both outcomes and the cost of producing them.

The trend: Enterprise software is moving from seat-based monetization toward usage-linked AI pricing as variable inference costs and customer scrutiny make bundled pricing harder to sustain.

Discussion

  • @jessefelder.com Jesse Felder on bluesky
    “Most of my clients hate it.  The costs go through the roof really quickly,” said Adrian Balfour, founder and chairman of AI consultant Envorso, about pricing models tied to usage. www.theinformation.com/articles/ atl...
  • @marypcbuk Mary Branscombe on bluesky
    Tokens cost something, eh [embedded post]