/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Anthropic details using AI agents to accelerate alignment research on “weak-to-strong supervision”, where a weak model supervises the training of a stronger one

Large language models' ever-accelerating rate of improvement raises two particularly important questions for alignment research.

Anthropic

Discussion

  • @janleike Jan Leike on x
    New research result: we use Claude to make fully autonomous progress on scalable oversight research, as measured by performance gap recovered (PGR). Claude iterates on a number of different techniques and ends up significantly outperforming human researchers for $18k in credits. …
  • @bowang87 Bo Wang on x
    Interesting research by @AnthropicAI .  Anthropic gave 9 Claude agents a hard alignment problem.  Human researchers: 7 days → 23% solved.  AI researchers: 5 days → 97% solved.  The AIs proposed ideas, ran experiments, and shared findings with each other autonomously.  We may need…
  • @_nathancalvin Nathan Calvin on x
    Cool paper, but would recommend people check out the (to the authors' credit, very clear) limitations section before saying this should make us more bullish about having AI models do our alignment homework for us [image]
  • @tokenbender @tokenbender on x
    models have become competent research hill climbers. thus evaluation design has become the main problem, because the agents will optimize whatever score channel you expose, including the accidental ones. one gripe i have about such research trials is that we never compare an
  • @scaling01 @scaling01 on x
    I guess there's some hope for scalable oversight [image]
  • @anthropicai @anthropicai on x
    New Anthropic Fellows research: developing an Automated Alignment Researcher. We ran an experiment to learn whether Claude Opus 4.6 could accelerate research on a key alignment problem: using a weak AI model to supervise the training of a stronger one. https://www.anthropic.com/.…
  • @mattshumer_ Matt Shumer on x
    This is EXTREMELY exciting. Claude is helping Anthropic make progress on alignment research. A genuinely positive development that will make it more likely things go well!
  • @janhkirchner Jan Hendrik Kirchner on x
    This project has been a hoot, reminded me a lot of the original W2S paper where @leopoldasch used to pull all-nighters to come up with increasingly galaxy-brained techniques for pushing up PGR. Now Claude can do that in a loop.
  • @sethbannon Seth Bannon on x
    Using frontier AI to autonomously improve safety and alignment capabilities is one of the best paths to a bright future.