Discussion

• @adamthierer Adam Thierer on x

  The core argument from @Xai against the Colorado AI Act (from page 33 of the complaint): “Despite being billed as a consumer-protection measure, SB24-205 lacks any statement of purpose or legislative findings evidencing the ‘algorithmic discrimination’ that the bill prohibits. [i…

• @davidsacks David Sacks on x

  Kudos to @xAI for being the first AI company to challenge a Colorado law requiring it to censor truthful answers if they could have a “differential impact” on protected groups. This is Woke AI. It teaches AI models to lie. And it's a violation of the First Amendment.

• @deanwball Dean W. Ball on x

  Kudos to xAI for being the ones with sufficient chutzpah to file this lawsuit against this deeply unconstitutional and stupid law in Colorado. I hope others in the industry at least speak up about this, if not launch their own legal challenges.

• @alexbruesewitz Alex Bruesewitz on x

  Thank you @elonmusk for standing up for what is right and pushing back against the woke insanity. This is an absolutely insane law!

• @burnhamdc James Burnham on x

  We are proud to defend @xai's truth-seeking mission against this misguided law, one that Governor Polis himself expressed “reservations” about. From our complaint: [image]

• @katiemiller Katie Miller on x

  Today, @xAI sued Colorado to stop a new law (SB24-205) that would force Grok to promote the state's ideological views on various matters, racial justice in particular. Colorado wants to force Grok to follow its views on equity and race, instead of being maximally truth-seeking.

• @adamthierer Adam Thierer on x

  @xai on First Amendment problems with the Colorado AI Act, @xAI identifies “the starkly divergent philosophies of today's frontier laboratories” take when training and tuning their models and then argues in it's complaint that: “These design choices manifest themselves in the way…