/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

A New Mexico jury finds that Meta violated state laws by failing to safeguard its platforms from child predators and orders it to pay $375M in damages

A jury has reached a verdict in a major New Mexico trial in which the state's attorney general alleged that Meta failed to safeguard its family of apps from child predators.

CNBC Jonathan Vanian

Discussion

  • @jason_kint Jason Kint on x
    Boom. Accountability domino number one. And this isn't Los Angeles which is imminent. Facebook/Instagram = Big Tobacco, a menace, has been the case to these juries of everyday Americans. 1/2 [image]
  • @hawleymo Josh Hawley on x
    Terrific news
  • @dareasmunhoz Diego Areas Munhoz on x
    This decision will certainly be cited by lawmakers in Washington making the push for kids online safety legislation
  • @andymstone Andy Stone on x
    @rebeccamkern Just a fraction of what the State sought
  • @rebeccamkern Rebecca Kern on x
    Meta says it will challenge New Mexico jury ruling that the social media giant owes $375 million in damages in child sex exploitation case
  • @matthewstoller Matt Stoller on x
    First a jury nailed Elon Musk, now a different jury nailed Meta. Let's move judges aside and have juries make these kinds of choices. https://www.cnbc.com/...
  • @andymstone Andy Stone on x
    Meta statement on New Mexico verdict: “We respectfully disagree with the verdict and will appeal. We work hard to keep people safe
  • @bymaddiehughes Maddie Hughes on x
    Meta was just served a $375 million fine in New Mexico for breaking the state's Unfair Practices Act. We've been covering the trial all along at @mlexclusive check here for our coverage https://mlex.shorthandstories.com/ ...
  • @jeffhorwitz Jeff Horwitz on bluesky
    For anyone losing track: the New Mexico Case was running parallel to the LA bellwether social media teen mental health case.  —  Jury finding for the state across the board is, however, a big moment for the crowd arguing that product liability offers a way around Section 230.
  • @mollyknight Molly Knight on bluesky
    Everyone dooming over how $185M means nothing to Meta: this lawsuit was brought by one (small) state.  Forty-nine plus DC to go.  —  It is okay and encouraged to celebrate Ws instead of just saying “it doesn't matter” every time any awful corporation faces ANY consequences.  This…
  • @jeffhorwitz Jeff Horwitz on bluesky
    New Mexico took a different tack from the other states going after broader youth well being stuff.  (It is not part of the massive multi-state case).  —  There is overlap, though, and I don't think there's anything stopping similar cases from being brought by AGs.  [embedded post…
  • @guntoucher @guntoucher on bluesky
    company that just finished burning up 70b on the metaverse: “lol” [embedded post]
  • @jeffhorwitz Jeff Horwitz on bluesky
    Verdict is in for the New Mexico child safety case against Meta.  Goes against Meta on every question.  —  Jury finds Meta liable for ~37,000 violations.  Maximum liability of $5,000 per violation.
  • @taylorlorenz Taylor Lorenz on x
    This case will now be cited by lawmakers in DC seeking to enact mass surveillance and censorship laws in the name of “kids online safety”, despite the fact that none of their laws do that. It will also only further the moral panic about open internet access
  • @robertfreundlaw Rob Freund on x
    Watch for politicians on both sides to say “See? We need kids off these dangerous platforms. To do that, we need to build a massive surveillance apparatus and destroy all online anonymity.” And people will support it “because kids.”
  • r/news r on reddit
    New Mexico jury says Meta harms children's mental health and safety |  AP News