/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

How gig apps like Kled AI, Silencio, Neon Mobile, and Luel AI pay users for data that AI companies can use to train models, from phone calls to videos of places

Gig AI trainers worldwide are selling moments of their lives, including calls and texts, to AI companies for quick cash

The Guardian Shubham Agarwal

Context & Ripple Effects

AI-training-data procurement has already supported payments for images, video and long-form recordings through specialized data deals. This story extends that market to app-mediated collection of participants' everyday communications and surroundings.

The reported model also sits alongside Babel Audio's paid stranger-to-stranger conversation recordings and freelance knowledge-work tasks for training-data firms, broadening the kinds of human activity being turned into model inputs.

First-order effects

  • Kled AI, Silencio, Neon Mobile and Luel AI create a direct cash-for-data channel through which users can contribute calls, texts and place videos for AI training.
  • Participants gain a new, low-friction gig option, while AI companies gain access to data types that are more closely tied to real-world speech, communication and locations.

Second-order effects

  • Data-collection apps and training-data vendors face pressure to offer clearer compensation and easier capture workflows as personal data becomes another source of training supply.
  • The value of data collection shifts toward consent, curation and rights handling: apps that can package usable records for model developers become intermediaries between individuals and AI buyers.

Third-order effects

  • If this approach scales, AI training-data markets could move from one-off annotation and commissioned datasets toward continuous, consumer-supplied data pipelines.
  • That shift would make the boundaries of consent, privacy and ownership more central competitive and policy questions, especially when a contributor's data can involve other people.

The trend: AI developers are diversifying beyond conventional web and vendor datasets by commercializing human activity and personal data as training inputs.

Discussion

  • @iamjenmcg Jen McGowan on bluesky
    Oh look they do value training  —  They just don't want to pay competitive rates  —  www.theguardian.com/technology/ 2...
  • r/technology r on reddit
    Thousands of people are selling their identities to train AI - but at what cost?