Filing: the US DOD said it designated Anthropic a supply chain risk over concerns the AI company could disable its tech if the Pentagon crossed its “red lines”
In response to Anthropic's lawsuit, the government said it lawfully penalized the company for trying to limit …
Wired Paresh Dave
Related Coverage
- Trump administration defends Anthropic blacklisting in US court Al Jazeera
- Trump Officials Fire Back at Anthropic Over AI Tool Ban Bloomberg · Rachel Metz
- U.S. Says Anthropic Is an ‘Unacceptable’ National Security Risk New York Times · Sheera Frenkel
- Pentagon responds to Anthropic suit arguing the company is a ‘substantial risk’ to national security Business Insider · Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert
- Trump Administration stands firm on Anthropic blacklisting as legal battle continues Business Today
- Defense Department says Anthropic poses ‘unacceptable risk’ to national security Engadget · Mariella Moon
- Trump administration defends Anthropic blacklisting in US court Reuters · Jack Queen
- Trump administration defends Anthropic blacklisting in US court RTÉ
- Pentagon replies to Anthropic's lawsuit; says: Refusal to accept the government's contractual terms is not protected by... Times of India
- The Defense Department reportedly plans to train AI models on classified military data Engadget · Mariella Moon
- DOD says Anthropic's ‘red lines’ make it an ‘unacceptable risk to national security’ TechCrunch · Rebecca Bellan
- Trump officials fire back at Anthropic over AI tool ban Mercury News · Rachel Metz
- This is such a bad idea! — The Pentagon is planning for AI companies to train on classified data, defense official says — https://www.technologyreview.com/ ... Posted into MIT Technology Review @mit-technology-review-mittechreview @ppatel@mstdn.social · Pratik Patel
- Pentagon files first rebuttal to Anthropic lawsuit: ‘Unacceptable risk’ Washington Examiner · David Zimmermann
- Pentagon Memo Sets 180-Day Countdown to Pull Anthropic AI From Military Systems The Defense Post · Giulia Bernacchi
- How the military is using AI in war CBS News · Jo Ling
- AI Wars: U.S. Government Considers Anthropic an ‘Unacceptable Risk’ to National Security Breitbart · Lucas Nolan
- Opposition/Response to Motion — Document #96 CourtListener · Brett A. Shumate
- Anthropic and OpenAI are hiring weapons specialists to prevent ‘catastrophic misuse’ Euronews · Anna Desmarais
- In an all-hands, OpenAI CEO of Applications Fidji Simo described a strategy shift to refocus on coding and business users, urging staff to avoid “side quests” Wall Street Journal · Berber Jin
- Trump administration argues Pentagon's Anthropic ban is justified, lawful The Hill · Miranda Nazzaro
- Anthropic vs. DoW #5: Motions Filed Don't Worry About the Vase · Zvi Mowshowitz
- Trump administration says Anthropic refusal was ‘not protected speech’ in US court TechRadar · Sead Fadilpašić
- Rallying for the Future of Humanity and a Safe AI Robert Reich
- Trump Defends Pentagon Ban On Anthropic, Calls It Legal And Justified Benzinga
Discussion
-
r/technews
r
on reddit
The Pentagon is making plans for AI companies to train on classified data, defense official says
-
r/politics
r
on reddit
The Pentagon is making plans for AI companies to train on classified data, defense official says
-
@deanwball
Dean W. Ball
on x
Interesting to me that the ‘hypersonic missile’ incident, which USG officials have spoken about publicly, is not mentioned at all in any of the government's public arguments/evidence submitted to the court yesterday. The government's brief makes no mention at all of the incident,…
-
@jtillipman
Jessica Tillipman
on x
No one is saying the government can't decide to stop contracting with Anthropic. It obviously can. The issue is that we have tools in our procurement system to exclude contractors, and blacklisting by tweet isn't one of them. FAR 9.4 covers this situation. If the government
-
@arozenshtein
Alan Rozenshtein
on x
Here's the government's response to Anthropic's lawsuit. Nothing much new here. Ultimately I think the question for the court will be: given that no on seriously contests the government's ability to refuse to purchase Anthropic's services (and probably refuse to allow its [image]