/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

GovAI and Brookings: many of the people most at risk if AI transforms work are also the best placed to find new jobs, as researchers disagree over AI's impact

Washington Post

Discussion

  • @daveshapi David Shapiro on x
    I've run similar exercises. But this doesn't include robots.
  • @cdmorlock Chris Morlock on x
    “If your whole job appears on a screen you're cooked” = PMC and menial service class Armageddon. Basically, the entire “knowledge worker” or “information worker” is the first to get wiped. Just like mechanical engineers in Detroit in the early 50's who set up all the
  • @afinetheorem Kevin A. Bryan on x
    I'd bet $1000 that from now to 2030, most “susceptible” jobs see *increased* share of labor. In the models these types of charts are based on, it is explicitly not “AI can substitute” but “AI is related”. AI is a complement too! Who *doesn't* want to code right now, for instance?
  • @dr_gingerballs @dr_gingerballs on x
    Guys, it's time to have the conversation that @karpathy might be an idiot.
  • @wagslane Lane on x
    I read the methodology. The scores are generated by.........asking Gemini flash to make one up?!? Am I missing something? I really like karpathy but this doesn't seem useful at all
  • @boringbiz_ @boringbiz_ on x
    The takeaway from this Karpathy jobs heat map is basically that you should have just skipped college and gone to trade school instead
  • @pawelhuryn Paweł Huryn on x
    Karpathy scored all 342 US occupations for AI exposure. Everyone's sharing the treemap. The actual insight is one line in the scoring rubric: If your entire job happens on a screen, you're exposed. Software devs: 8-9. Roofers: 0-1. Medical transcriptionists: 10/10. 342
  • @thestalwart Joe Weisenthal on x
    > Every job in the US economy > 342 occupations
  • @kimmonismus @kimmonismus on x
    Andrej Karpathy has launched an analysis of AI on jobs. Karpathy is by no means interested in hype or exaggeration. Using AI, he concluded that out of 143 million working people in the US, approximately 57 million are at high to very high risk of their jobs being negatively [imag…
  • @_kaitodev Kaito on x
    5 minutes ago, @karpathy just dropped karpathy/jobs! he scraped every job in the US economy (342 occupations from BLS), scored each one's AI exposure 0-10 using an LLM, and visualized it as a treemap. if your whole job happens on a screen you're cooked. average score across [imag…
  • @kevinschaul Kevin Schaul on bluesky
    New: AI job exposure is important, but there's more to the picture.  Here's what the research says on adaptability.  —  Find your job here 🎁 wapo.st/4cP2ZHM [image]
  • @shiraovide Shira Ovide on bluesky
    The feared AI jobs apocalypse may be fine for relatively affluent workers like programmers.  —  It may not be for clerical and administrative workers.  —  Great visuals by @kevinschaul.bsky.social with a reminder: We are historically awful at predicting how tech changes work.  — …