Discussion

• @w01fe Jason Wolfe on x

  I signed this brief opposing the Supply Chain Risk designation against Anthropic, and supporting the importance of restrictions on domestic surveillance and autonomous weapon applications for current models. Very grateful for all the people who worked hard to make it happen.

• @ramez Ramez Naam on x

  Based. Mad respect.

• @sarah_cogan Sarah Cogan on x

  ah yes an intuitive alphabetical ordering of names [image]

• @thezvi Zvi Mowshowitz on x

  You love to see it. As opposed to the government, whose response was “The president “will never allow a radical left, woke company” to dictate how the military operates,” which is not how I would choose to respond to a lawsuit claiming retaliation for protected speech. But hey.

• @luizajarovsky Luiza Jarovsky, PhD on x

  🚨 BREAKING: OpenAI and Google filed an amicus brief supporting Anthropic. The four main arguments: 1. The “supply chain risk” designation is improper retaliation that harms the public interest. 2. The concerns underlying Anthropic's “red lines” Are real and require a response.

• @benbrodydc Ben Brody on x

  And here's another amicus in the Anthropic lawsuit, from FIRE, EFF, Cato, Chamber of Progress and the First Amendment Lawyers Association https://www.courtlistener.com/ ...

• @atrupar Aaron Rupar on x

  Ted Cruz: “I'll confess — I have not seen a basis laid out for why the government would be prohibited from using Anthropic. Claude is one of the many AI tools that can be very helpful ... I don't think government should be picking winners and losers” [video]

• @william_fitz William Fitzgerald on x

  Staffers in AI labs have so much power the US military is scared of them not doing exactly what they want. This fear goes back to #CancelMaven campaign at Google which pissed of the military guys. They're worried it'll happen again in AI labs, and my god do i hope it does.

• @s_oheigeartaigh @s_oheigeartaigh on x

  Very good to see. Respect to all involved.

• @arozenshtein Alan Rozenshtein on x

  This is good—not so much because it will convince the judge (though it might), but because it's a way of building norms of solidarity within Silicon Valley.

• @deanwball Dean W. Ball on x

  If any people or organizations want to sign on to @JoinFAI's amicus brief in support of Anthropic, please reach out to me or @Allinallnotbad. You better believe I will be signing.

• @truefactsstated Claude Taylor on x

  Thanks to all supporting our efforts. Signed, Claude

• @thedataroom @thedataroom on x

  Stand up against mass AI surveillance Stand with Anthropic, Dario Amodei, and Jeff Dean #keep4o

• @turn_trout Alex Turner on x

  I signed an amicus brief supporting Anthropic's right to do business without governmental retaliation. As an AI expert, I attest that Anthropic's technical concerns are legitimate, and no laws were designed to protect against AI analysis of surveillance data.

• @zeffmax Max Zeff on x

  NEW: OpenAI and Google employees—including Google DeepMind Chief Scientist Jeff Dean —filed an amicus brief in support of Anthropic in its lawsuit against the US government. [image]

• @pamspaulding Pam Spaulding on bluesky

  And...employees of OpenAI & Google take a stand:  —  “If allowed to proceed, this effort to punish one of the leading US AI companies will undoubtedly have consequences for the United States' industrial & scientific competitiveness in the field of artificial intelligence & beyond…

• @peard33 Paresh Dave on bluesky

  Anthropic v Department of Defense draws support of employees at rival AI companies www.wired.com/story/openai...

• r/technology r on reddit

  OpenAI and Google Workers File Amicus Brief in Support of Anthropic Against the US Government

• r/google r on reddit

  OpenAI and Google Workers File Amicus Brief in Support of Anthropic Against the US Government

• r/Anthropic r on reddit

  OpenAI and Google Workers File Amicus Brief in Support of Anthropic Against the US Government

• r/OpenAI r on reddit

  OpenAI and Google Workers File Amicus Brief in Support of Anthropic Against the US Government

• @edzitron Ed Zitron on x

  The only thing that makes sense here is that Anthropic's 2025 revenues were much lower than $4.5 billion. $5bn ALL TIME? Through march? Remember this is filed with a court. Suggests Anthropic is a much much smaller business than we believed

• @edzitron Ed Zitron on x

  Remember: reports said Anthropic made $4.5bn for all of 2025, and all of this guff about “$19bn in annualized revenue” no longer make sense, especially as that “exceeds $5 billion” line is from a lawsuit filed in *march*. This is a scandal! [image]

• @edzitron Ed Zitron on x

  $5 billion TO DATE? This heavily suggests that Anthropic? Over $10 billion in inference and training costs? This heavily suggests that almost every story about Anthropic's revenue and costs they've leaked is wrong and that it's been misleading the media.

• @peard33 Paresh Dave on x

  Court filings: Anthropic has spent $10 bln on training and inference. Its generated $5 bln in all-time revenue. Now billions of dollars in revenue for just this year is at stake and customers/prospects are already asking for new terms or backing out. https://www.wired.com/...

• @peard33 Paresh Dave on bluesky

  Court filings: Anthropic has spent $10 bln on training and inference.  Its generated $5 bln in all-time revenue.  —  Now billions of dollars in revenue for just this year is at stake and customers/prospects are already asking for new terms or backing out.  —  www.wired.com/story/…

• r/tech r on reddit

  Anthropic Claims Pentagon Feud Could Cost It Billions |  WIRED

• r/OpenAI r on reddit

  Anthropic Claims Pentagon Feud Could Cost It Billions

• r/Anthropic r on reddit

  Anthropic Claims Pentagon Feud Could Cost It Billions

• r/technology r on reddit

  Anthropic Claims Pentagon Feud Could Cost It Billions

• r/politics r on reddit

  Anthropic sues the Pentagon after being labeled a threat to national security

• r/politics r on reddit

  White House readies executive order to weed out Anthropic