Discussion

• @claudeai Claude on x

  Introducing Code Review, a new feature for Claude Code. When a PR opens, Claude dispatches a team of agents to hunt for bugs. [video]

• @yuchenj_uw Yuchen Jin on x

  Finally, this is happening. [image]

• @rohanvarma Rohan Varma on x

  If you want AI Code Review, but don't want to pay $25 per review (not a typo), check out Codex Review! It leverages frontier Codex models, finds complex issues, and 100% usage based. Most runs should cost ~$1 or less https://developers.openai.com/ ...

• @sterlingcrispin Sterling Crispin on x

  $25 per PR review The frog is starting to boil

• @lanreadelowo @lanreadelowo on x

  Claude code writes the code then reviews it for $20 then finds critical issues then Claude code fixes those issues. Only for Claude code to review it again for $20. AGI

• @adocomplete Ado on x

  Introducing Code Review for Claude Code. A deep, multi-agent review system that catches bugs that even human reviewers often miss. This is the system we've been running on nearly every PR at Anthropic. Doesn't approve PRs, but helps close the gap so devs can keep up. [video]

• @rhyssullivan Rhys on x

  A $15-$25 PR review bot that catches an incident which would've cost the company $5m in breached SLAs and reputation is a no brainer

• @bznotes Bilal Zuberi on x

  Code review commoditized.

• @jarredsumner Jarred Sumner on x

  Been using this in Bun's repo for weeks & giving lots of feedback This, imo, is the best product in the code review category today. It regularly catches extremely subtle bugs and rarely makes mistakes

• @claudeai Claude on x

  Agents search for bugs in parallel, verify each bug to reduce false positives, and rank bugs by severity. You get one high-signal summary comment plus inline flags.

• @trq212 @trq212 on x

  Code Review is so so good. One of those things I can't remember how I lived without.

• @dillon_mulroy Dillon Mulroy on x

  i'm convinced we have the best code review agent at cloudflare and it's not even close in terms of quality signal to noise

• @claudeai Claude on x

  Code Review optimizes for depth and may be more expensive than other solutions, like our open source GitHub Action. Reviews generally average $15-25, billed on token usage, and they scale based on PR complexity.

• @lucas_montano Montano on x

  we need to admit defeat we won't be reviewing code before it goes to production humans are already the bottleneck

• @kayvz Kayvon Beykpour on x

  Sensible for Claude to launch this and we plan on benchmarking to see how it compares. But fwiw $15-25 per review is well over an order of magnitude more expensive than @Macroscope. Not because we want to subsidize model costs, but because architecturally our agent can use

• @icesolst @icesolst on x

  $15-25 PER PR?? I already thought the $1 per scan of /security-review was not scalable, this must be a weird strategy to anchor the initial price super high

• @bcherny Boris Cherny on x

  New in Claude Code: Code Review. A team of agents runs a deep review on every PR. We built it for ourselves first. Code output per Anthropic engineer is up 200% this year and reviews were the bottleneck Personally, I've been using it for a few weeks and have found it catches

• @derrickcchoi Derrick Choi on x

  $25 per code review... is a lot. @OpenAI Codex code review costs 90% less than other solutions on the market, and we're seeing enterprises like Datadog ( https://openai.com/...) move their code review workflows entirely to Codex. Also Codex Security is free for the next month

• @gilgnyc Gil on x

  Imagine spending $15-25/pr on code review and you still have daily downtime and buggy releases. I'd be more confident in this feature if their production quality was higher. [image]

• @daniel_mac8 Dan McAteer on x

  Engineering Managers everywhere shaking in their boots.

• @davidcrespo @davidcrespo on bluesky

  “Reviews are billed on token usage and generally average $15-25”  —  sounds high, but it means they take themselves to have solved the problem.  the challenge with LLMs is to get them good enough where throwing more tokens at a problem gets you more. then you throw as many tokens…

• @natemoo.re Nate Moore on bluesky

  > Reviews are billed on token usage and generally average $15-25  —  Seems like an accurate cost-per-token compared to heavily subsidized alternatives  —  Companies that haven't priced in current discounts are going to get rekt when the “find out” phase begins  —  claude.com/blog…

• @khushiirl @khushiirl on x

  Wake up guys... Claude just wiped out half the SaaS market again [video]

• @___4o____ @___4o____ on x

  This marks the beginning of the end of the subsidized inference era. It will only go higher.

• @joelgrus Joel Grus on x

  “what's your TAM” “garry tan writes 10,000 LoC a day, you do the math”

• @sawyerhood Sawyer Hood on x

  claude code will soon cost more than hiring an engineer [image]

• @rahll Reid Southen on x

  If Claude Code is so good, why do they need a separate feature to hunt for bugs.

• @cgtwts @cgtwts on x

  “babe wake up.” Claude just dropped Code review. [video]

• @ryancarson Ryan Carson on x

  I honestly don't understand why people seem to not grasp why $20 for a great code review is cheap

• @pr0grammerhum0r @pr0grammerhum0r on x

  I'll review your PR for $10

• @altimor Flo Crivello on x

  People's comments on the $15-25 per PR price tag remind me of Michael Bloomberg's answer to people balking at the $2,700 / mo cost of the Bloomberg Terminal: “if you can't make $2,700/mo with our product, you got bigger problems to deal with”

• @weswinder Wes Winder on x

  i really don't understand why you would pay $25 for claude to review a SINGLE pr when opus 4.6 isn't even the best model for deep code review gpt 5.4 is the only model i trust for reviews rn

• @tukifromkl Tuki on x

  🚨They're not even pretending anymore. > Claude just announced that when you open a pull request, it sends a TEAM of AI agents to review your code. > The thing your senior developer charges $200K/year to do? An AI army now does it the second you hit submit. > And they called [vide…

• @davidkpiano David K on x

  This is what it feels like when Claude is also writing all the code [image]

• @uwukko @uwukko on x

  i can review PRs for $15-25 too

• @claudeai Claude on x

  We've been running this on most PRs at Anthropic. Results after months of testing: PRs w/ substantive review comments went from 16% → 54% <1% of review findings are marked incorrect by engineers On large PRs (1,000+ lines), 84% surface findings, avg 7.5 issues each

• @pxue Paul Xue on x

  I get the trade off is hiring a dev for $100+/hr so having Claude review a PR for $15-25 feels like a no brainer. But the problem is Claude will never tell you your PR is stupid in the first place. A good dev will, and that's priceless.

• @bcherny Boris Cherny on x

  @Rahll 👋 Roughly, the more tokens you throw at a coding problem, the better the result is. We call this test time compute. One way to make the result even better is to use separate context windows. This is what makes subagents work, and also why one agent can cause bugs and anoth…

• @dakshgup Daksh Gupta on x

  gotta say, we picked one of the better weeks to raise prices for our code review product

• @indofunctor Sy Oppington on x

  more expensive than an indian, my job is safe

• @boringbiz_ @boringbiz_ on x

  Software engineers watching Claude automate their job in real time [video]

• @bolatwtx Aryan Bola on x

  Hiring Indians would cost cheaper then this

• @phalgooon @phalgooon on x

  India's cost arbitrage is back on the menu gang

• @cryptopunk7213 @cryptopunk7213 on x

  this is fucking ridiculous lol - anthropic just killed a $50B industry with a single feature (again): - companies pay $50K a year to scan their code for vulnerabilities. - anthropics Code Review does it for you in minutes for a fraction of the cost. - deploys multiple agents

• @moviemuthyam @moviemuthyam on x

  Claude can never take my job Cuz I have no job [video]

• @jsensarma @jsensarma on x

  1. Subsidize code generation 90% so everyone forgets how to read/write code manually. 2. Now charge 10x - to ensure the generated code - that you largely can't understand - actually works. Donut and Dietician shop working out of same office.

• r/ClaudeAI r on reddit

  Introducing Code Review, a new feature for Claude Code.

• @jsensarma @jsensarma on x

  Anthropic's office .. [image]