/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Anthropic debuts Code Review for Claude Code, which uses agents to check pull requests for bugs, and says a code review could average $15-$25 in token usage

ZDNET David Gewirtz

Discussion

  • @trq212 @trq212 on x
    Code Review is so so good. One of those things I can't remember how I lived without.
  • @bcherny Boris Cherny on x
    New in Claude Code: Code Review. A team of agents runs a deep review on every PR. We built it for ourselves first. Code output per Anthropic engineer is up 200% this year and reviews were the bottleneck Personally, I've been using it for a few weeks and have found it catches
  • @yuchenj_uw Yuchen Jin on x
    Finally, this is happening. [image]
  • @claudeai Claude on x
    Introducing Code Review, a new feature for Claude Code. When a PR opens, Claude dispatches a team of agents to hunt for bugs. [video]
  • @sterlingcrispin Sterling Crispin on x
    $25 per PR review The frog is starting to boil
  • @icesolst @icesolst on x
    $15-25 PER PR?? I already thought the $1 per scan of /security-review was not scalable, this must be a weird strategy to anchor the initial price super high
  • @daniel_mac8 Dan McAteer on x
    Engineering Managers everywhere shaking in their boots.
  • @lanreadelowo @lanreadelowo on x
    Claude code writes the code then reviews it for $20 then finds critical issues then Claude code fixes those issues. Only for Claude code to review it again for $20. AGI
  • @lucas_montano Montano on x
    we need to admit defeat we won't be reviewing code before it goes to production humans are already the bottleneck
  • @jarredsumner Jarred Sumner on x
    Been using this in Bun's repo for weeks & giving lots of feedback This, imo, is the best product in the code review category today. It regularly catches extremely subtle bugs and rarely makes mistakes
  • @claudeai Claude on x
    Code Review optimizes for depth and may be more expensive than other solutions, like our open source GitHub Action. Reviews generally average $15-25, billed on token usage, and they scale based on PR complexity.
  • @claudeai Claude on x
    Agents search for bugs in parallel, verify each bug to reduce false positives, and rank bugs by severity. You get one high-signal summary comment plus inline flags.
  • @adocomplete Ado on x
    Introducing Code Review for Claude Code. A deep, multi-agent review system that catches bugs that even human reviewers often miss. This is the system we've been running on nearly every PR at Anthropic. Doesn't approve PRs, but helps close the gap so devs can keep up. [video]
  • @bznotes Bilal Zuberi on x
    Code review commoditized.
  • @natemoo.re Nate Moore on bluesky
    > Reviews are billed on token usage and generally average $15-25  —  Seems like an accurate cost-per-token compared to heavily subsidized alternatives  —  Companies that haven't priced in current discounts are going to get rekt when the “find out” phase begins  —  claude.com/blog…
  • r/ClaudeAI r on reddit
    Introducing Code Review, a new feature for Claude Code.