A study finds LLMs from Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and xAI can help with academic fraud, specifically helping non-researchers submit fabricated papers to arXiv
Fraudulent papers written by AI are becoming a serious problem. Guess which AI is most willing to cooperate with this sort of dishonest fraud? — www.nature.com/articles/d41... [image]
Why tenured academics and administrators insist that using this technology is unproblematic and just how the future should work with none of our input is baffling to me. Feels like a modern cargo cult.
“All major LLMs can be used to either commit academic fraud or facilitate junk science...guard rails are easily circumvented” — Is anyone surprised? www.nature.com/articles/d41...
“Non-scientists with pet theories should ideally be directed away from arXiv” — www.nature.com/articles/d41... bioRxiv: “Hypotheses without new data...are considered out of scope and will not be posted” — www.biorxiv.org/about/FAQ 1/n
A new trend is emerging called “hallucinogenic retrofitting”. When your LLM of choice hallucinates bibliography, instead of fixing it you fabricate the linked paper. [embedded post]