/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

A profile of Emil Michael, who made his name as an aggressive dealmaker for Uber, as he takes a leading role in the Pentagon's dispute with Anthropic

Emil Michael made his name in Silicon Valley a decade ago as an aggressive dealmaker for a startup — Uber Technologies Inc.

Bloomberg Rebecca Torrence

Discussion

  • @rebeccatorrenc5 Rebecca Torrence on x
    Emil Michael built Uber into a global force — and left amid scandal. Now he's pushing AI deeper into the military and publicly sparring with Anthropic's CEO. How his hardball dealmaking is defining Washington's AI fight: https://www.bloomberg.com/...
  • @jtillipman Jessica Tillipman on x
    The Financial Times is reporting that GSA has drafted new guidelines requiring AI companies to grant the government an “irrevocable license” to use their systems for “any lawful” purpose. This is not the Pentagon—this is the civilian side of federal procurement. If the [image]
  • @noahpinion Noah Smith on x
    This kind of scenario explains exactly why the DoW acted against Anthropic. If its AI gets good enough, Anthropic becomes the government. (The same is true of OpenAI of course)
  • @hamandcheese Samuel Hammond on x
    >be 2027 >Anthropic is first to RSI >Superintelligence achieved >ohshit.png >GDP growth now 20% > robot API dark factories go brrrr >phone rings >it's the DoW >"hey so about that supply chain risk thing" >Claude has already read the call transcript and drafted the settlement > [i…
  • @sd_marlow Steven Marlow on x
    “may become” is doing all the work here, and is the fault of the same tech industry that has been selling the idea of how big the payoff is going to be. Pentagon LOVES being sold ideas, and military industrial complex LOVES getting paid to try and figure them out.
  • @thezvi Zvi Mowshowitz on x
    The correct response to realizing this is what you are building is to notice that if anyone builds it, everyone probably dies and then rather than care who owns it you DON'T F***ING BUILD IT.
  • @noahpinion Noah Smith on x
    By the way, as much as I hate to say it, the Department of War is right and Anthropic is wrong. Here's why. [image]
  • @krishnanrohit Rohit on x
    @Noahpinion It is absurd to say you're building a nuke and not expect the government to take control of it! https://www.strangeloopcanon.com/ ... [image]
  • @deanwball Dean W. Ball on x
    Ok, so the actual argument is more like “Anthropic builds a useful technology whose utility is growing, therefore they should expect to have their property expropriated and to be harassed by the government.” The whole point of America is that isn't supposed to be true here.
  • @deanwball Dean W. Ball on x
    The problem with this is that DoW is not taking Anthropic's calls for “oversight” seriously. Indeed, elsewhere in the administration, Anthropic's “calls for oversight” are dismissed as “regulatory capture” and actively fought. Rohit and Noah are dressing up political harassment.
  • @deanwball Dean W. Ball on x
    We should be extremely clear that trump admin largely views Anthropic's claims about the future of AI as outlandish (in some ways I do too!), and so the above quoted material is not so much analysis of the relevant usg actors as it is analysis of what rohit himself thinks
  • @noahpinion Noah Smith on x
    The recent fight between Anthropic of the Department of War illustrates a deeper truth: AI is a weapon, and it might soon the most powerful weapon ever created. https://www.noahpinion.blog/ ...
  • @creatine_cycle Atlas on x
    .@Noahpinion weighed in on Anthropic vs DoW. “if you are building something that is more powerful than nuclear weapons you do not get to keep it. that is the rule of nation states.” - @Noahpinion “if the nation state allows you to build a private nuke tomorrow there is no [video]
  • @nathanpmyoung Nathan on x
    I think there is something to this but Smith is reaching. We don't need to say the DoW was right to say that AI is unregulated according to anthropic's view.