An Evercore ISI economist criticizes Citrini's AI report, calling its assumptions “extreme and improbable”, but says it's a thought-provoking exercise
Financial Times Robin Wigglesworth
Related Coverage
- Another Viral AI Doomer Article, The Fundamental Error, DoorDash's AI Advantages Stratechery · Ben Thompson
- AI will lead to huge societal disruption, a market-roiling new paper says — but some researchers are skeptical MarketWatch · Jules Rimmer
- Citrini Founder Shocked His AI Prediction Spurred Stocks Selloff Bloomberg · Georgie McKay
- Breaking Down the Viral Memo That Spooked Markets Wall Street Journal · Jack Pitcher
- The author of the AI doomer essay that rattled Wall Street Sources · Alex Heath
Discussion
-
@dkthomp
Derek Thompson
on x
I really want people to see the story above the story here, which is that whether you're reading Citrini, or listening to Jamie Dimon at a cocktial party, the conversation about AI is a marketplace of competing science fiction narratives. That's not to say I think the
-
@kobeissiletter
@kobeissiletter
on x
It's Too Obvious. What If AI Doesn't Actually End The World?
-
@fchollet
François Chollet
on x
“Any software engineer can now produce much more value than before” “No one will want to hire software engineers” Both of these cannot be true at the same time.
-
@klaudnin3
Kira
on x
The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis That Wasn't A Macro Memo from the Actual June 2028, Not the Fanfic Version The unemployment rate printed 3.8% this morning, roughly where it's been all year. The market yawned. The S&P 500 is at 7,400, which is somehow both a record high and a
-
@firstadopter
Tae Kim
on x
Software investors the day after Citrini-pocalypse [image]
-
@kantrowitz
Alex Kantrowitz
on x
An instantly disqualifying line in the Citrini paper: “In every way AI was exceeding expectations, and the market was AI. The only problem...the economy was not.” Sorry, this in implausible.
-
@pratyushbuddiga
Pratyush
on x
Whenever this cycle ends, the Citrini “report” will be an extremely funny relic of the mania like a Bored Ape or Peloton's stock chart. The DoorDash analysis is a third grader's understanding of marketplaces.
-
@ce_mcenerny
C.E. McEnerny
on x
Yep. I have a realtor friend, and his huge advantage is that he knows literally everyone. Contractors, home inspectors, government officials, lenders, other agents. There are no surprises for him—anything that pops up, he's seen before. No AI agent is going to have the personal
-
@jyarow
Jay Yarow
on x
Gratifying rebuttal to the Citrini article. The bit about real estate agents is particularly good. The internet should have killed that business. Not clear why AI agents will get it done if Zillow couldn't. https://stratechery.com/...
-
@benjysarlin
Benjy Sarlin
on x
So do the short sellers just hire Ted Chiang to ghostwrite bullet pointed newsletter takes now or...?
-
@eric_seufert
Eric Seufert
on x
For the past few months, I have been writing a long-form podcast articulating an AI Bull Thesis for the digital economy. I call it The Prosperous Society. In light of the Citrini report, I decided to chop it up and release it episodically. Episode 1 is live. [image]
-
@ben_golub
Ben Golub
on x
Citrini slop is a wonderful teaching moment
-
@milkroad
@milkroad
on x
The Kobeissi Letter just published a sharp rebuttal to Citrini's “2028 Global Intelligence Crisis” thesis. Save this breakdown - you'll want to revisit it when the next wave of panic hits. Kobeissi's core argument = the bearish AI case is “too obvious” and probably wrong. [image]
-
@jbsteinberg
Joseph Steinberg
on x
@rbrtrmstrng in FT on Citrini slop https://www.ft.com/... [image]
-
@binarybits
Timothy B. Lee
on x
The Citrini essay includes a paragraph about an industry I know something about. Redfin tried to do this exact business model (bare-bones buy-side agent who rebates 2/3 of the 3% fee) and consumers hated it. I see no reason to think an AI version will work better. [image]
-
@modeledbehavior
Adam Ozimek
on x
Citrini piece may be nonsense but it's the kind of impact professional take havers dream of
-
@n0th0stl3tk0v3r
@n0th0stl3tk0v3r
on x
walked by three desks with the citrini article open this morning
-
@edels0n
Ed Elson
on x
Here is what I wrote to our team re Citrini: I just read the Citrini article. It's actually really good (so much better than the Matt Shumer post). However, the market has no business reacting the way it did. It's a total hypothetical disguised as an absolute because of how it's
-
@innoc_bystander
@innoc_bystander
on x
Reading the Citrini report felt like being forced to listen to 2 mid-IQ bros, stoned out of their respective minds, debate something without respect for complex systems while the captain of the football team, who just suffered a severe concussion, tells them how smart they are.
-
@metacriticcap
@metacriticcap
on x
If you're a bull, the worst thing you can say is “Citrini's scenario happens too fast” If we don't have enough compute and scaling laws happen over a longer time scale, this means that AXP will get its day of reckoning in 2032, not 2028! A decade of uncertainty! Ouch!
-
@iridiumeagle
TravisGood
on x
The meta-thinking proposed by the Citrini piece is correct: Our economy has been making huge leveraged bets on assumptions that will fail, and bad things will happen as a result. See also: Commercial real estate vs COVID.
-
@rtylercrown
Tyler Crown
on x
The Citrini article makes me more bullish on regulated industries, as places to invest, start companies, or work. Banking, insurance, healthcare, etc.
-
@quantian1
@quantian1
on x
>longs assmad Citrini put out a piece that didn't have any particular relevance to their holdings but caused them to lose a shitload of money anyways [image]