Sam Altman says currently “the idea of putting data centers in space is ridiculous” and that it is “not something that's going to matter at scale this decade”
Once allies at OpenAI, Sam Altman and Elon Musk are now sharply divided over the future of AI infrastructure.
The Indian Express Bijin Jose
Related Coverage
- Sam Altman Unfiltered: ChatGPT, AI Risks & What's Coming Next, 40 Questions in 60 Minutes The Indian Express on YouTube
- Sam Altman says Elon Musk's idea of putting data centers in space is ‘ridiculous’ Business Insider · Lauren Edmonds
- Sam Altman on Putting Data Centers in Space: ‘Ridiculous for Now’ The Indian Express on YouTube
- Data centres in space a ‘ridiculous’ idea for now: Sam Altman The Economic Times
- Elon Musk Is Betting Big On Data Centers In Space, But OpenAI's Sam Altman Just Gave His ‘Ridiculous’ Idea A Reality Check: ‘How Hard It Is To...’ Benzinga · Eva Mathew
- Orbital Data, Niche Markets Give Space Solar a New Shimmer Payload · Austin Corona
- Sam Altman thinks tech companies are ‘AI-washing’ their layoffs San Francisco Chronicle · Lucy Hodgman
- Even Sam Altman thinks CEOs are blaming AI for layoffs Fast Company · Pavithra Mohan
- Sam Altman says companies ‘AI washing’ by blaming unrelated layoffs on AI The American Bazaar · Nileena Sunil
- Sam Altman, Dario Amodei Avoid Holding Hands at India AI Impact Summit International Business Times · Akshay Puri
- Sam Altman fires back at Elon Musk's proposal for space-based data centers, says orbiting data centers ‘ridiculous’ for now — cites high failure rates and cost as primary limiters Tom's Hardware · Anton Shilov
- Some days, you're in front of the mic. — Some days, you're building the mic, the lights, the frame... and the moment. … Aabir Lahiry
- Sam Altman highlights the energy cost of human training NextBigWhat
- Altman Says Data Centers in Space Idea is ‘Ridiculous’ The Information · Martin Peers
- Sam Altman Says Companies ‘AI Wash’ Layoffs While Under 1% of Job Losses Trace to AI Implicator.ai · Maria Garcia
- ‘Humans use lot of energy too’: OpenAI's Sam Altman on resources consumed by AI, data centres The Indian Express
- ChatGPT CEO Lists 2 Jobs Which Are At Least Risk From AI Trak.in · Mohul Ghosh
- ‘AI can help kids achieve more but overreliance may hurt learning’: Sam Altman Business Today
- So humans use a lot of energy too? Might be, but the small but nevertheless very important difference is that the average human being (which means around 7.9 billion people) pay for their energy consumption with the money they earn from a hard job. Those humans are NOT RUNNING ON VENTURE CAPITAL! … @kinghaunst@augsburg.social
- These people should, instead of having an outsized influence on society, be physically banned from it and I am not being remotely hyperbolic. — https://techcrunch.com/... @GrimmReality@beige.party
Discussion
-
@businessinsider.com
@businessinsider.com
on bluesky
While in New Delhi on Friday, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said “there will come a time” for orbital data centers, but it won't be anytime soon.
-
@karlbode.com
Karl Bode
on bluesky
I like how Sam Altman always tries very hard to pretend he's somehow outside of the corporate behaviors he's criticizing, in some weird bid to get credibility he doesn't have
-
@mikeelgan
Mike Elgan
on bluesky
For the first time ever, Sam Altman says something in public I actually agree with. gizmodo.com/sam-altman-s...
-
@annaciaunica
@annaciaunica
on x
Looks like our paper with @erikjbekkers is more timely than ever ! If you had to chose between unplugging an AI claiming it's conscious and or a pre-term incubator - which one would you choose ? https://arxiv.org/... [image]
-
@rosiegray
Rosie Gray
on x
Are the AI people trying on purpose to come across as completely sinister
-
@david_fairchild
L. David Fairchild
on x
He's not just defending AI energy use. He is smuggling in a whole anthropology where humans are basically inefficient meat computers that you have to pour food and years into before they become useful. And once you accept that, the next move is obvious. If people are just costly
-
@kapoorkkunal
Kunal Kapoor
on x
I'm very pro tech and his intent here is to talk about energy, but you can see why people are becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the tech bros. It reflects a broader discomfort in how they frame humanity. Culturally, some of this language starts to echo the archetype of
-
@sketchesbyboze
@sketchesbyboze
on x
You need to understand that Silicon Valley is increasingly being run by creepy, dead-eyed men who hate families, who hate kids, who have no respect for life, who would like to see much of humanity dead or enslaved. It's our job to defeat the dystopia they're so eager to build.
-
@heyaimsarah
Sarah
on x
America's treasure is her natural resources. These untouched lands that belong to us, the public. Don't let them trade this for a bunch of fucking data centers [image]
-
@nomads4pritzker
@nomads4pritzker
on x
Famously, human learning takes *very little* energy. A toddler learns thousands of words and an entire grammar while eating nothing but raspberries, before learning to read. An LLM needs a nuclear reactor and the entire internet as a training corpus.
-
@aakashgupta
Aakash Gupta
on x
A human consumes about 2,000 calories per day. Over 20 years, that's roughly 17,000 kWh of total food energy. Training GPT-4 consumed an estimated 50 GWh of electricity. That's 3,000 humans worth of “training energy” for a single model run. And GPT-4 is already dead. OpenAI
-
@seanilling
Sean Illing
on x
I simply cannot express how passionately I dislike these people
-
@boringbiz_
@boringbiz_
on x
I honestly think the reason we see so much main street pushback against AI is because of how the leaders of the largest companies in the space have framed the technology If they had just said they were building cool technology that helps people be more productive, it would be
-
@davidbessis
David Bessis
on x
Why does Sam insist on declaring war against his entire customer base? That's a truly bizarre positioning for a mainstream business.
-
@melatkirosco
@melatkirosco
on x
This is how disposable we are to the billionaires developing AI. That's why I'm calling for regulations on AI and the data centers that are straining our energy grids. There's too much at stake with this technology, and we need to make sure AI benefits us all, not just the few.
-
@arzandc
Arzan Tarapore
on x
This is why we need philosophers, not only coding nerds.
-
@samhaselby
Sam Haselby
on x
This is how industrial agriculture talks about livestock.
-
@tompark1n
Tom Parkin
on x
Humans are a waste of life and food energy, says AI billionaire
-
@kortizart
Karla Ortiz
on x
This is: 1. BS from a snake oil salesman 2. Psychotic 3. A position based on so much disdain for you and your future. Their proposal is to take everything away from you: opportunities, livelihoods, environment. We gotta legally rein in these people and their companies asap
-
@mmitchell_ai
@mmitchell_ai
on x
A problem, it seems to me, is that many people don't see or experience people's humanity. #NotAllPeople. If you don't experience others' humanity, then reducing them to computer-like processing is completely sensible. 1/
-
@brianbeutler
Brian Beutler
on x
Psychotic.
-
@realbalajee
@realbalajee
on x
Sam is simply rebutting a common argument made against the efficiency of AI models. While I don't think he is right because humans have a higher capacity to learn / become more efficient over time than a trained AI models, I find the moral pearl clutching to be quite dumb.
-
@toadsanime
Ryan T. Brown
on x
This is an evil, warped worldview from an evil, warped man who has lost his humanity and doesn't see people as any different to machines with a work/financial purpose. We are inefficient tools to the inhuman cretin. He can't be fixed. The world is worse for his existence.
-
@koylanai
@koylanai
on x
I build AI for a living. I believe in what we're building. But this kind of rhetoric makes my work harder and more dangerous. @sama, comparing human development to model training is tone-deaf, strategically reckless. People are losing jobs. They're getting angry. They're
-
@svembu
Sridhar Vembu
on x
I do not want to see a world where we equate a piece of technology to a human being. I work hard as a technologist to see a world where we don't allow technology to dominate our lives, instead it should quietly recede into the background.
-
@bigblackjacobin
Edward Ongweso Jr
on x
we can write a million essays about how the future Silicon Valley wants to build is underwritten by a deep disgust with / contempt for Being A Human, or we can just let them speak for themselves
-
@framesofnick
Nick
on x
This is the talk of a traitor to the human race
-
@alexbores
Alex Bores
on x
Computer scientist and new dad here. I'm raising a child because that's the joy of life. I'm running for Congress because my son—all of our kids—deserve AI that enriches their lives and works for them, not against them. Altman's mission seems to be unfettered AI at all of our
-
@gmiller
Geoffrey Miller
on x
Conservatives need to understand that the AI industry's foundational ideology is contempt for humans, and the total confidence that they can replace humans with entities that are more ‘efficient’. If you support that, you're not a ‘conservative’ in any meaningful way.
-
@rob_flaherty
Rob Flaherty
on x
One of the fundamental problems with “just let the AI guys do whatever they want” is that the AI guys seem to have never interacted with a real person in their entire lives https://x.com/...
-
@topherspiro
Topher Spiro
on x
These people need to be regulated.
-
@xriskology
Dr. Émile P. Torres
on x
“To train a human.” Altman has previously said that people are nothing more than “stochastic parrots.” He holds a profound dehumanizing view of our species.
-
@matthewstoller
Matt Stoller
on x
He's saying a really big spreadsheet and a baby are morally equivalent. One reason to believe that life is divine is so that you don't allow sociopaths like this anywhere near anything important.
-
@christosargyrop
@christosargyrop
on x
Let's fact check Sammie here. 25 years x 365 days = 9,125 days Caloric needs vary by age; let's assume 2500 on average ~ 23M calories ~ 27 kilowatt-hours to raise a human. A gaming GPU is about 0.4 watts/hr. So playing games for 3 days straight consumes more energy than raising
-
@tanya_sabrinaaa
Tanya
on x
we should stop feeding children so we can feed data centers
-
@mollysoshea
Molly O'Shea
on x
Yes, Sam — but brains are far more energy efficient than computers. Brain: 20 watts AI: gigawatts Biology wins. Naveen Rao (@NaveenGRao) CEO, @unconvAI Konstantine Buhler (@Konstantine) Partner, @sequoia TLDR: Biology currently delivers far more general intelligence per [video]
-
@motorhueso
Eugenio Tisselli
on x
I don't know how much energy was used to train Altman, but it clearly was a huge waste.
-
@snmrrw
Sean Morrow
on x
He's danced around this before, but this seems like the most direct admission that he's anti-humanity, a traitor against us all who should be treated as such.
-
@charlottealter
Charlotte Alter
on x
there is something so fundamentally gross abt this
-
@shauseth
Shaurya
on x
calling humans meat computers that eat too much food was a completely optional way to address the issue btw
-
@alex_peys
Alex Peysakhovich
on x
~3000 calories per day = 22m calories in 20 years =~ 25k kw - assume 10x inefficiency in production = 250k kw ~ assume 10 kw per hour to run a 8x H100 machine = 25k*8 = 200k gpu hours llama3 8b took 1.3m gpu hours (~6 people), 405b took 31m (~150 people) this doesn't count all
-
@tcarmody
Tim Carmody
on bluesky
He really thought he had a winner with this one. “Check and mate!” [embedded post]
-
@fatraccoon
@fatraccoon
on bluesky
Man with above average intelligence easily steps into logical fallacy trap. — “But it also takes a lot of energy to train a human,” Altman said. “It takes like 20 years of life and all of the food you eat during that time before you get smart...” — techcrunch.com/2026/02/21/…
-
@jfarkas
Johan Farkas
on bluesky
When tech companies anthropomorphize AI, they also dehumanise people. Case in point: Sam Altman just said that we shouldn't worry about the climate impact of AI because humans eat food. — techcrunch.com/2026/02/21/s...
-
@seanokane
Sean O'Kane
on bluesky
My god this is genuinely one of the dumbest arguments I've ever heard — techcrunch.com/2026/02/21/s...
-
@obyrska
Olga Byrska
on bluesky
Meanwhile, in our dystopia: “People talk about how much energy it takes to train an AI model ... But it also takes a lot of energy to train a human. It takes like 20 years of life and all of the food you eat during that time before you get smart.” Sam Altman
-
@harfenist
Ethan Harfenshvitz
on bluesky
Being confident enough to say something this ghoulish to an audience should automatically get you investigated for potentially abusing employees. — This dude clearly doesn't value human life and looks at the rest of us as meat for his grinder
-
@Edelruth@mastodon.online
@Edelruth@mastodon.online
on mastodon
@Techmeme — Another anthropomorphization of the LLM: now it is ‘raised’, and comparable to a child.
-
@gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
Gerry McGovern
on mastodon
Sam Altman would like remind you that humans use a lot of energy, too — Altman — who was in India for a major AI summit — said concerns about AI's water usage are “totally fake,” though he acknowledged it was a real issue when “we used to do evaporative cooling in data centers.…
-
r/behindthebastards
r
on reddit
Sam Altman would like to remind you that humans use a lot of energy, too
-
r/BetterOffline
r
on reddit
Sam Altman would like remind you that humans use a lot of energy, too
-
r/technology
r
on reddit
Sam Altman would like remind you that humans use a lot of energy, too