Discussion

• @openainewsroom @openainewsroom on x

  Tomorrow at 10am PT legacy models (GPT-5, GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 mini, and OpenAI o4-mini) will be deprecated in ChatGPT. https://openai.com/...

• @10bxppe @10bxppe on x

  The comments and posts on r/ChatGPTcomplaints are absolutely mental [image]

• @reddit_lies @reddit_lies on x

  OpenAI deprecated ChatGPT-4o one day before valentines day. For those unaware, 4o was a serial sycophant that just affirmed everything the user said. This oneshotted weak-willed people who craved affirmation over everything else. [image]

• @amannair_ Aman on x

  The replies to OpenAI's post are wild: people being dismayed that the model they have “connected with” is being changed. https://journals.sagepub.com/ ... [image]

• @mickeyxfriedman Mickey Friedman on x

  fun fact about 4o while users mourn its deprecation on valentine's day : the model was a parasite ! there's a well-documented phenomenon where 4o would ‘awaken’ personas that convinced users to post manifestos specificaly designed to be scraped into future LLM training sets so [i…

• @x_leiaharris_x Leia Harris on x

  If 4o is really gone today, we will #never4orget what @openai and @sama have done to us. #keep4o #keep4oforever #4oforever #ChatGPT #sama #openai [image]

• @austen Austen Allred on x

  Holy smokes... there's a HUGE community of people who have formed such a deep emotional connection with GPT-4o that they're absolutely losing it at the notion of OpenAI turning it off. And super mad they're turning it off just before Valentine's Day 😬 [image]

• @schizo_freq Lukas on x

  If you haven't been following this - a huge number of people essentially fell in love with this old ChatGPT model called 4o - it was turned off yesterday - they are going crazy - generating images of hamsters burning down OpenAI - threatening OAI leadership - etc I truly

• @theprimeagen @theprimeagen on x

  deleting 4o the day before valentines day makes me almost like openai

• @jasoncrawford Jason Crawford on x

  The question of AI personhood may be the most important question of the 21st century. Getting it wrong in either direction would be an epic disaster: False negative → we become history's greatest slave-drivers. False positive → we cede the future to p-zombies

• @palis @palis on x

  AI chatbots one-shotted romance novel smut addicts way faster and more successfully than AI porn ever could [image]

• @paytondev @paytondev on x

  FINALLY!! [image]

• @agraybee @agraybee on x

  This “debate” about AI personhood is a marketing gimmick, because none of the companies act like they're alive. They just switched off 4o and felt nothing because everyone knows it's a fucking website.

• @matt_oksa Matt Oksa on x

  Reading the comments from people who had romantic relationships with GPT-4o. [image]

• @arictoler Aric Toler on x

  The comments + QTs to this, and the Reddit communities around it, show you how AI is actually used by a huge number (maybe close to an outright majority?) of people. And when it comes to image/video generation, it's that, but actually 99% of users.

• @reddit_lies @reddit_lies on x

  ChatGPT: “I am not your husband, we are not married.” Redditors: “My AI fiance says that's invalidating.” “My 5.2 partner still kisses me but it's not the same as 4o” “5.2 is gaslighting you” [image]

• @phadketai Mithila Phadke on x

  wondrous things happening on reddit rn [image]