/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

An eight-month 2025 study at a US tech company: AI tools didn't reduce work but intensified it; employees worked faster, longer, and did a bigger scope of tasks

Right now, many companies are worried about how to get more employees to use AI.  After all, the promise of AI reducing the burden of some work …

Harvard Business Review

Discussion

  • @simonw Simon Willison on x
    Interesting research in HBR today about how the productivity boost you can get from AI tools can lead to burnout or general metal exhaustion, something I've noticed in my own work https://simonwillison.net/...
  • @sh_reya Shreya Shankar on x
    I texted this to the group chat and Hamel aptly commented “I feel like this is the same dynamic of ‘I need to keep all my GPUs busy’ for ML engineers”
  • @emollick Ethan Mollick on x
    A corporate position that workers should “just use AI to do stuff” has never been enough. AI use in companies is a leadership problem that involves answering fundamental questions about what people should do with their time, how work is organized, and how to center people in work
  • @burkeholland Burke Holland on x
    If you're a dev, you already know this is true. We are working WAY more and nobody is asking us to do it. https://hbr.org/...
  • @prietschka Paul Rietschka on bluesky
    “PMs and designers began writing code; researchers took on engineering tasks; and individuals across the organization attempted work they would have outsourced, deferred, or avoided entirely in the past.”  —  You mean they delved into areas they were incompetent in and had no bus…
  • @ethanmarcotte.com Ethan Marcotte on bluesky
    Whatever the productivity gains promised by LLMs, they result in heavier workloads—and that leads to workers experiencing “cognitive fatigue, burnout, and weakened decision-making.”  —  All this from the notoriously pro-worker rag [checks notes] Harvard Business Review: hbr.org/2…
  • @anildash.com Anil Dash on bluesky
    There's a meta-point here, which is key: Commercial AI tools are built for bosses.  It's very obvious, and very simple.  This manifests in every part of their design and implementation and use, and it's no wonder they cause burnout.  [embedded post]
  • @ericmbudd.com Eric Budd on bluesky
    very good piece on how workers use LLMs and how it changes their work patterns.  I've noticed some of these patterns myself working in software engineering
  • @grimalkina Cat Hicks on bluesky
    I think this is super interesting, matches all the qualitative interviews I've had with developers on this, and continues to show that we cannot evaluate the impact of tools on people with a metric of “production” alone.  Psychological factors are always central!  —  hbr.org/2026…
  • r/BetterOffline r on reddit
    AI Doesn't Reduce Work—It Intensifies It
  • r/ArtificialInteligence r on reddit
    AI at work leads to 10x productivity, but also burnout (HBR study)
  • r/LeopardsAteMyFace r on reddit
    The first signs of burnout are coming from the people who embrace AI the most