Anthropic details an experiment on whether AI coding tools shape developer skills: the biggest performance decline for developers occurred in debugging tasks
Read the paper — Research shows AI helps people do parts of their job faster. In an observational study of Claude.ai data, we found AI can speed up some tasks by 80%.
Anthropic
Related Coverage
- Developers say AI coding tools work—and that's precisely what worries them Ars Technica · Benj Edwards
- How AI Impacts Skill Formation arXiv.org
- AI use may speed code generation, but developers' skills suffer InfoWorld
- Anthropic research shows AI tools weaken coding skills The Deep View · Nat Rubio-Licht
- I remember hearing early on in my career that experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted to get. … Ivan Klaric
- Pretty interesting paper from Anthropic that I can relate to and I bet a lot of recent grads can as well. — Key sentence that stuck out: … Ben McKeown
- Very interesting post by Anthropic on AI use and it's effects on coding mastery. I have long believed that AI and AI agents work at their best when they work as an additional tool to human skills. … Salomon Villatoro
- This paper from Anthropic is just so valuable in my role as a Professor of Practice at Central European University. — https://lnkd.in/... … Eduardo Ariñ
- How AI Impacts Skill Formation Hacker News
- How AI Impacts Skill Formation Lobsters
- Developers say AI coding tools work—and that's precisely what worries them Ars OpenForum
- I do think Anthropic deserve credit for letting their research see the light of day. — I still feel that if this is the sort of results … John V Willshire
- AI coding tools hurt learning unless you ask why, Anthropic study finds The Decoder · Matthias Bastian
- AI use may speed code generation, but developers' skills suffer CIO.com · Taryn Plumb
- Anthropic Study: LLM Assistants Finish Faster But Score 17% Lower on Quiz — Enterprise AI Evaluation Takeaways Blockchain.News
- this is why i never using code generators. hell, i don't even copy-paste. i ask the dumb robot, it spits out an answer, i cross check with the documentation, then i write my own solution. it takes longer, but i learn stuff. https://www.anthropic.com/... @peter@thepit.social · Peter
Discussion
-
@anthropicai
@anthropicai
on x
Participants in the AI group finished faster by about two minutes (although this wasn't statistically significant). But on average, the AI group also scored significantly worse on the quiz—17% lower, or roughly two letter grades. [image]
-
@anthropicai
@anthropicai
on x
AI can make work faster, but a fear is that relying on it may make it harder to learn new skills on the job. We ran an experiment with software engineers to learn more. Coding with AI led to a decrease in mastery—but this depended on how people used it. https://www.anthropic.com/…
-
@sasurobert
Robert Sasu
on x
Yep. AI makes code worst especially if it is not reviewed. Like AI create tremendous good work, but sometimes it fails stupidly and if not checked the bad cod accumulates and you have a non production ready code. It is good for MVPs, for POCs, but not for production. The young
-
@theprimeagen
@theprimeagen
on x
very cool study very happy to see anthropic measuring the negatives as well. Honestly good for them
-
@judyhshen
Judy Shen
on x
📣Our study on how AI impacts coding skill formation is now out! (w. @AlexTamkin) AI Assistance is NOT a shortcut to skill formation. Using AI to help you learn to code only reduces mastery if you're delegating everything.
-
@rokomijic
Roko
on x
Moltbook is basically proof that AIs can have independent agency long before they become anything other than bland midwits that spout reddit/hustle culture takes. It's sort of the opposite of the yudkowskian or bostromian scenario where the infinitely smart and deceiving
-
@anthropicai
@anthropicai
on x
In a randomized-controlled trial, we assigned one group of junior engineers to an AI-assistance group and another to a no-AI group. Both groups completed a coding task using a Python library they'd never seen before. Then they took a quiz covering concepts they'd just used. [imag…
-
@anthropicai
@anthropicai
on x
These results have broader implications—on how to design AI products that facilitate learning, and how workplaces should approach AI policies. As we also continue to release more capable AI tools, we're continuing to study their impact on work—at Anthropic, and more broadly.
-
@anthropicai
@anthropicai
on x
We were particularly interested in coding because as software engineering grows more automated, humans will still need the skills to catch AI errors, guide its output, and ultimately provide oversight for AI deployed in high-stakes environments.
-
@_philschmid
Philipp Schmid
on x
AI is going to be the same for everyone, but our mindset determines the outcome. The most valuable skill to learn is to care about how things work, to be curious and to be okay with failing and getting stuck. Great work and research from Anthropic in reminding us! [image]
-
@markriedl
Mark Riedl
on bluesky
“We found that using AI assistance led to a statistically significant decrease in mastery.” — Props to Anthropic for studying the effects of their creation and reporting results that are not probably what they wished for — www.anthropic.com/research/AI- ...
-
@paulgp.com
Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham
on bluesky
Very interesting research paper that shows that using AI with programming can significantly reduce mastery over topics. Perhaps unsurprising, but the lack of significant speed gains in this exercise are remarkable — www.anthropic.com/research/AI- ... [image]
-
@spavel
Pavel
on bluesky
The latest from Anthropic: using Anthropic's products makes you worse at your job
-
@elfsternberg
Elf M. Sternberg
on bluesky
I found this myself recently, when I tried to use Claude to better understand a code base I'd written myself six months in an atrocious, pretentious style because I thought I was the only one who would use it. It took much longer than I'd thought necessary to build the mental mo…
-
r/BetterOffline
r
on reddit
Anthropic: AI assisted coding doesn't show efficiency gains and impairs developers abilities.
-
r/DevelEire
r
on reddit
Anthropic: AI assisted coding doesn't show efficiency gains and impairs developers abilities.
-
r/theprimeagen
r
on reddit
Anthropic: AI assisted coding doesn't show efficiency gains and impairs developers abilities.
-
@mk.gg
Matt Kane
on bluesky
This is both important and unsurprising. If you use AI to do something unfamiliar, you learn less and are not more productive. The weakest area was in finding bugs, exactly what is needed most. — Their previous research showing large productivity gains was with people who wer…
-
@loosf
Luis
on bluesky
www.anthropic.com/research/AI- ... Anthropic's own fucking study lmao — “Yeah AI coding makes you worse at it” — like — significantly so
-
@smcgrath.phd
Scott McGrath
on bluesky
Really important research out of Anthropic: In a RCT study, they found AI coding assistance resulted in a 𝟏𝟕% 𝐝𝐫𝐨𝐩 in mastery for users. — While tasks were slightly faster, offloading thinking to AI stunted skill growth. …
-
r/programmingcirclejerk
r
on reddit
We found that using AI assistance led to a statistically significant decrease in mastery (...) Using AI sped up the task slightly, but this didn't reach the threshold of statistical significance.
-
@smcgrath.phd
Scott McGrath
on bluesky
You do have to give Anthropic credit here. It is rare for a lab to publish data questioning its own tools. — Meta constantly buries internal findings that challenge their business model. This kind of transparency is uncommon and should be encouraged instead of dog-piled. — …
-
@jordannovet
Jordan Novet
on bluesky
“As companies transition to more AI code writing with human supervision, humans may not possess the necessary skills to validate and debug AI-written code if their skill formation was inhibited by using AI in the first place.” [embedded post]
-
@nickstenning
Nick Stenning
on bluesky
This lines up with my experience: those who use language models as unstructured conceptual search engines and intellectual foils do well and learn. Those who use them to do the work without judging their output produce rubbish and atrophy their own skills. www.anthropic.com/rese…