Analysis: scientists who appeared to use LLMs posted 33% more papers on arXiv than those who didn't, as concerns grow over AI slop in scientific publishing
The Atlantic Ross Andersen
Related Coverage
- How AI hallucinations, fake citations are creeping into scientific research The Indian Express
- Scientist Horrified as ChatGPT Deletes All His Research Futurism · Victor Tangermann
- This is so unnerving — a problem that will only get worse before it gets better. “For more than a century, scientific journals have been the pipes through … Erin Spencer, PhD
- “From here on, it's going to be a constant arms race,” as AI tools give fraudulent or shoddy work a new veneer of scientific plausibility … Andrew Scheuber
- Fascinating article from the Atlantic, so much has been written on this topic, often always citing the same people, who predictably say the same things … Ioana A. Cristea
- These days, scientific papers submitted for publication (or to conferences) regularly contain phantom citations thanks to the use of chatbots. “Most had not been caught during peer review. That might be because many of the peer reviews were themselves done by AI”: https://www.theatlantic.com/ ... @alfiekohn@sciences.social · Alfie Kohn
- “For more than a century, scientific journals have been the pipes through which knowledge of the natural world flows into our culture. Now they're being clogged with AI slop.” — Ross Andersen at The Atlantic — https://www.theatlantic.com/ ... … @mattjhodgkinson@scicomm.xyz · Matt Hodgkinson
- Despair-Inducing Analysis Shows AI Eroding the Reliability of Science Publishing Gizmodo · Mike Pearl
Discussion
-
@thiagokrause
Thiago Krause
on bluesky
Horrifying - but less of a problem for history. I still can't see a LLM-generated manuscript getting past peer-review, except in irrelevant/low-quality journals no one actually reads.
-
@drjacekdebiec
@drjacekdebiec
on bluesky
“AIs would write most papers, and review most of them.. This..back-and-forth would..train newer AI models. Fraudulent images and phantom citations would embed themselves..in our..knowledge. They'd become a permanent epistemological pollution..” — #AcademicSky — www.theatlan…
-
@dsquintana
Dan Quintana
on bluesky
AI slop is everywhere in scientific publishing, we're only catching the easy-to-detect stuff (like when you happen to peer review a manuscript with a AI-hallucinated reference of a paper you apparently wrote) — www.theatlantic.com/science/ 2026...
-
@kim_harding@mastodon.scot
@kim_harding@mastodon.scot
on mastodon
Science Is Drowning in AI Slop — https://www.theatlantic.com/ ... Peer review has met its match.