/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR ▲
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

An analysis of 5,290 AI research papers at NeurIPS: 141, or ~3%, had US-China AI lab collaboration, vs. 134/4,497 in 2024; Llama featured in 106 Chinese papers

WIRED analyzed more than 5,000 papers from NeurIPS using OpenAI's Codex to understand the areas where the US and China actually work together on AI research.

Wired Will Knight

Related Coverage

Discussion

  • r/EverythingScience r on reddit
    Irony alert: Hallucinated citations found in papers from NeurIPS, the prestigious AI conference
  • r/technology r on reddit
    Irony alert: Hallucinated citations found in papers from NeurIPS, the prestigious AI conference
  • r/skeptic r on reddit
    GPTZero's analysis 4841 papers accepted by NeurIPS 2025 show there are at least 100 with confirmed hallucinations
  • @smcgrath.phd Scott McGrath on bluesky
    Analysis of 5,000 NeurIPS papers confirms US and Chinese AI research remains linked.  Joint work accounts for 3% of output.  Technology flows both ways: Chinese labs adopt Llama, while US researchers use Alibaba's Qwen.