/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

The UK launches a consultation on whether to ban under-16s from using social media, alongside restrictions on addictive app features like infinite scrolling

Move comes as peers prepare to vote on an amendment to a bill that would enact a ban within a year of the bill passing

The Guardian Kiran Stacey

Discussion

  • @douglascarswell Douglas Carswell on x
    The party that gave us the Online Safety law has learned nothing.
  • @charleshymas Charles Hymas on x
    Banning social media for under 16s will not work and could put children at greater risk of harm, the father of Molly Russell has said @leicesterliz @Keir_Starmer @KemiBadenoch @mollyroseorg @_andyburrows @NSPCC @5RightsFound @PoliceInspForum @DamianCollins @DannyShawNews
  • @lauratrottmp Laura Trott MP on x
    Momentum is shifting fast towards a social media ban for u16s. The Government should act. Credit to the Labour MPs calling for action, alongside parents, teachers & health professionals who want change. We can do this. Labour must back our amendment on Wednesday.
  • @richardwellings Richard Wellings on x
    A reminder that Britain is effectively a one-party state on the agenda to impose digital IDs, destroy online privacy and undermine freedom of speech. Similar policies are in the pipeline across the West, so this has been ordered from above and they're just the puppets.
  • @davidghfrost David Frost on x
    All the worst decisions in this country get taken when Govt and Opposition agree and actual debate is squeezed out. There was a time when the Tory party would have considered endorsement of their proposals by Labour and by public sector lobbyists as a red flag, not a reason to
  • @kemibadenoch Kemi Badenoch on x
    It tells you everything that Labour MPs support Conservative plans to restrict social media for under-16s. The evidence is clear. The harm is real. And yet Keir Starmer still doesn't have the backbone to act. Parents need our support in protecting children from adult spaces.
  • @prestonjbyrne Preston Byrne on x
    Very strange seeing myself and the Molly Rose Foundation on the same side of a political question, but they're right: a social media ban doesn't make anyone safer.
  • @landeur @landeur on x
    What the British State is doing is very obvious here. They are building problems, deliberately, that require a Digital ID to be the solution. It's called manufacturing consent. Illegal working? If only we had Digital ID. Proving you're 16 for social media? If only we had...
  • @rupertlowe10 Rupert Lowe MP on x
    I absolutely back a ban on social media for under 16s, IF the parents agree. It's not for the Government to decide, it's for mums and dads. Here's a mad idea. Why don't we let parents parent? THEY know best. A ban is unworkable and total state overreach. AGAIN.
  • @togetherdec @togetherdec on x
    @LauraTrottMP Not even kids safety organisations think banning social media for U16s is a good idea [image]
  • @richardwellings Richard Wellings on x
    Age verification is being used as a pretext to impose digital IDs and to crack down on online anonymity. They also want to stop children seeing viewpoints that challenge the propaganda they learn at school and from establishment media. So it's yet another assault on our freedom.
  • @lukeaaronmoore Luke on x
    This is literally the least controversial policy available to the government at this point, and they should just get it done, post-haste. Seriously, tell me a single argument against it.