/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

CoinGecko: 53%+ of the 20.2M crypto tokens launched since 2021 are now inactive, with 7.7M tokens failing in Q4 2025, after October 10's “liquidation cascade”

Over 13.4 million tokens have been erased between mid-2021 and 2025, according to a new analysis by CoinGecko.  —  What to know:Forums:SlashdotForums:Slashdot:53% of Crypto Tokens Launched Since 2021 Have Failed, Most in 2025

CoinDesk Helene Braun

Context & Ripple Effects

The report places the recent washout in a longer record of token attrition: exchange removals and prolonged inactivity were already rising in 2023 token delistings, while an earlier ICO-era review found many funded projects never reached exchange listings.

What has changed is the scale implied by millions of launches since 2021 and the concentration of failures after a market shock. That reinforces the earlier gap between token issuance and lasting tradability.

First-order effects

  • CoinGecko's figures make the post–October 10 liquidation cascade a clear marker for token failures, with 7.7 million tokens becoming inactive in Q4 2025.
  • Holders and traders in affected tokens lose viable markets and price discovery, while token issuers that remain active face a more skeptical benchmark for durability.

Second-order effects

  • Exchanges, data providers, and wallet interfaces have stronger incentive to remove or de-emphasize illiquid assets, continuing the pattern of tokens being delisted after extended inactivity.
  • For new token launches, attention and liquidity become harder to win: market participants may favor assets with sustained trading and development over sheer issuance volume.

Third-order effects

  • If high attrition persists through market downturns, crypto's token economy could become more bifurcated between a smaller set of durable, liquid assets and a large disposable long tail.
  • The figures strengthen the case for evaluating token markets through survival and liquidity, not launch counts—a central feature of the crypto legitimacy gap.

The trend: Crypto markets are increasingly being judged by whether tokens retain liquidity and activity through volatility rather than by the volume of new launches.