/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Google says it's appealing the US v. Google ruling that found it has an illegal search monopoly and asks a court to pause some of the remedies during the appeal

In the meantime, it's asking a court to pause remedies meant to restore competition.

The Verge Lauren Feiner

Discussion

  • @openwebadvocacy @openwebadvocacy on x
    This is perhaps surprising given the most damaging remedies were rejected by Judge Mehta in the Final Judgement, namely the sale of Chrome and a total ban on search engine deals with browser vendors.
  • @openwebadvocacy @openwebadvocacy on x
    They are asking for a stay on remedies related to disclose “data related to Google's Web Search index” and “User-side Data” to “Qualified Competitors,” as well as the requirements to enter a “search syndication license” and “Search Text Ads agreement” with “Qualified Competitors”