/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Report: Facebook's CrowdTangle tool, used by US state election officials to monitor misinformation, doesn't effectively monitor most posts, like those in Groups

Bloomberg Kurt Wagner

Context & Ripple Effects

The warning signs about Groups are old: back in 2018, Facebook's push to build and promote Groups was flagged as easily exploited by bad actors in the Mueller indictment. That same cycle, analysts found that even with heavy outside scrutiny, false news still spread faster than platforms could contain it, leaving monitoring to researchers rather than the company.

Today's report closes the loop awkwardly for Facebook: with the 2020 election weeks away, US state election officials depend on CrowdTangle to track misinformation, yet the tool covers only a sliver of the platform — most posts, including those in the very [[e:Groups|Groups]] product repeatedly tied to manipulation, sit outside its view.

First-order effects

  • State election officials monitoring misinformation lose visibility into most of Facebook's surface area right before Election Day, with Groups — where the 2018 indictment said bad actors organize — essentially dark to their primary tool.

Second-order effects

  • Monitoring shifts further to outsiders, echoing the 2018 pattern where independent researchers had to prod Facebook; separately, Facebook gains an argument for discounting CrowdTangle data, prefiguring its later claim that the tool measures engagement but not reach against its '6% political content' framing.

Third-order effects

  • If the platform's own measurement tool stays blind to whole product surfaces while its team gets reassigned amid internal fights over what CrowdTangle reveals about top-engaging sources, third-party auditing of major platforms hardens into a regulatory question rather than a research nicety.

The trend: Platform transparency is moving from voluntary, limited internal dashboards toward contested external oversight, as the gap between what platforms measure and what actually spreads keeps forcing outsiders and eventually regulators into the monitor's seat.

Discussion

  • @ttp_updates @ttp_updates on x
    Facebook executives have been pushing two different narratives on the effectiveness of CrowdTangle, touting the effectiveness of the tool to state officials in private communications while other Facebook reps push a difference narrative to the public https://www.techtransparencyp…
  • @slpng_giants @slpng_giants on x
    Unless there's true accountability and real oversight, democracy will not survive @Facebook. https://twitter.com/...
  • @davidgura David Gura on x
    “At 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on election night, millions of ads could show up on Facebook saying something along the lines of, ‘We won—Donald Trump is president for four more years! MAGA!’—even if mail-in ballots haven't been fully counted.” https://www.fastcompany.com/ ...
  • @ridt Thomas Rid on x
    CAUTION: today's Facebook takedown does not mean China-interferes-in-the-2020- election. It means that “individuals in Fujian Province” spectacularly failed to interfere in the 2020 election. Remember: some active measures are only really activated by their post-takedown coverage…
  • @sarahelago Sarah Elago on x
    “Although the people behind this activity attempted to conceal their identities, our investigation found links to Philippine military and Philippine police...Advertising: Around $1,100 in spending for ads on Facebook paid for in Philippine peso.” Read: https://about.fb.com/...