Discussion

• @quantumchannel_ @quantumchannel_ on x

  Does this retraction renormalize the expectations about topological qubits? Definitely yes https://www.wired.com/...

• @lanceulanoff Lance Ulanoff on x

  When you make mistakes at a quantum level https://www.wired.com/... via @wired

• @stephansroche Stephan Roche on x

  83 years after Ettore's “evaporation”- “Majorana hunters” should have remembered legendary words... “The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool"@ProfFeynman @spinespresso https://www.wired.com/... https://twitter.com/...

• @piratecto Sergio Gago on x

  Microsoft's Big Win in Quantum Computing Was an ‘Error’ After All - Tweets by Sergey Frolov, a physicist who questioned missing data in the 2018 paper. In March 2018, Dutch physicist and Microsoft employee Leo Kouwenhoven published headline-grabbing new ... https://www.wired.com/…

• @quantumaephraim Aephraim Steinberg on x

  See https://www.wired.com/... for popular summary; and https://arxiv.org/... for the great line. Next time I need to say “this wasn't what I thought it was,” I will also have to remember the optimistic phrasing “my original claims have a ‘wider interpretation’” ! [2/2]

• @caseynewton Casey Newton on x

  Fun holiday weekend idea: find the Majorana particle https://twitter.com/...

• @andreasateth Andreas Wallraff on x

  Interesting article in @WIRED on #Majorana particles, open questions about their observation, and their potential use in #quantum #computers. With commentary from @spinespresso and @VincentMourik . https://www.wired.com/... via @wired