/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Apple says that ~1M new apps and ~1M app updates were rejected in 2020, 470,000+ developer accounts were terminated over fraud concerns, and more

- Apple said it rejected almost 1 million apps that were submitted to its App Store for the first time in 2020.

CNBC Kif Leswing

Context & Ripple Effects

Apple had already described removing apps for privacy-rule violations and deleting spam reviews in 2020; these figures extend that enforcement from individual listings to developer identities. The later first App Store Transparency Report made app rejections and government requests a recurring disclosure category.

The 2020 account terminations establish a baseline for Apple’s subsequent fraud reporting, including 428,000 developer accounts closed in 2022 and later disclosures of blocked transactions. The story matters because App Store enforcement reaches both the software submitted and the parties allowed to submit it.

First-order effects

  • Nearly 1 million proposed new apps and a similar number of updates did not reach the App Store in 2020, while more than 470,000 developer accounts lost access over fraud concerns.
  • Apple’s review operation becomes a more consequential gatekeeper for developers: rejection can stop a release, while termination removes the account through which apps and updates are distributed.

Second-order effects

  • Developers must treat account integrity and update review as operating requirements, not just product-release checks, because enforcement covers both submissions and publisher accounts.
  • Apple gains a stronger basis for presenting its App Store controls as anti-fraud infrastructure, a theme it later quantified through multi-year fraud-prevention reporting.

Third-order effects

  • The pattern points to App Store governance becoming a standing measurement and disclosure function, rather than an opaque moderation process limited to individual app decisions.
  • As platform enforcement increasingly spans app review, developer identity, and transaction fraud, control of the distribution channel becomes more central to Apple’s role in the mobile software market.

The trend: App-store operators are evolving from app curators into integrated trust-and-safety gatekeepers for software, developer accounts, and payments.

Discussion

  • @benedictevans Benedict Evans on x
    “Apple App Store stopped over $1.5 billion in suspect transactions in 2020” Political timing for this release. Everything is content moderation. Would be good to see prevalence data (what % of totals are these numbers?) https://www.apple.com/...
  • @kocienda Ken Kocienda on x
    @marcoarment I even dipped my toe back in last year with my iOS word game. I was unsatisfied with the App Store. Apple claimed 30% of my effort and I don't know who my customers are unless they reached out. No thanks.
  • @stephennellis Stephen Nellis on x
    When you cut through the legal arguments, one of the key items the court will decide is whether IAP is an integrated feature of the App Store distribution mechanism (Apple's position) or a separate product that is tied (anticompetitively, in Epic's view) to store distribution. ht…
  • @lanceulanoff Lance Ulanoff on x
    I'm amused by the apps that changed after the review process into things like gambling apps or pornography. Those devils. https://www.cnbc.com/...
  • @marcoarment Marco Arment on x
    The only things I want to hear from Apple at WWDC: - You can use whatever payment system you'd like within your apps, and ours will compete on its merits. - You can disclose the App Store's rules to your users in your app. I don't expect either until a government forces them.
  • @kocienda Ken Kocienda on x
    @marcoarment Since 2017, I've been figuring out ways to be happy and productive in my career without having Apple in my critical path. More people should try it.
  • @kifleswing Kif on x
    If you were wondering how big the market is for bootleg Enterprise Certificate apps on iPhones: “And in just the last month, Apple blocked more than 3.2 million instances of apps distributed illicitly through the Apple Developer Enterprise Program.” https://www.cnbc.com/...
  • @marcoarment Marco Arment on x
    It's probably best for developer relations if as much time as possible passes between the Epic trial, in which Apple continues to shit all over developers and take credit for all of our work, and WWDC, in which they try to tell us how great we are and how much they value us. http…
  • @marcoarment Marco Arment on x
    Instead, what we keep hearing from Apple is “You owe us for your entire business, you should be thankful for everything we've done for you, we don't need you, we're doing you a favor by allowing you, and your apps add absolutely no value to our highly profitable hardware.”