/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

As carmakers integrate 100-150+ chip-based electronic control units in each car, a look at the challenges of an auto industry that is more dependent on software

IEEE Spectrum Robert N. Charette

Context & Ripple Effects

The modern car is already a distributed computing system: IEEE Spectrum counts 100-150+ chip-based electronic control units per vehicle, each running its own firmware, stitched together over the aging CAN bus that the industry has been trying to replace since at least the push for a new in-vehicle networking standard. That architecture was fine when cars were mostly mechanical, but every new feature adds another computer and another line of software a carmaker must integrate.

The strain is now visible across the supply chain. The 2021 chip shortage pushed carmakers to bypass their traditional parts-vendor intermediaries and build direct ties with chip makers, and by 2024 McKinsey pegged automotive chips as a $150B market by 2030. Meanwhile legacy systems are showing their limits in the field: [[a:881101|NHTSA data shows software fixes rose from 6% of US automotive recalls in 2019 to 15% in 2024]].

First-order effects

  • Parts vendors lose their gatekeeper role on semiconductors as carmakers contract directly with chip makers — the intermediary layer that defined auto sourcing for decades gets squeezed out of its most valuable component category.
  • Legacy carmakers face rising engineering cost per vehicle model: integrating and testing firmware across 100-150+ ECUs means every recall increasingly requires a software fix rather than a mechanical part swap.

Second-order effects

  • Chip makers gain direct customer relationships and pricing leverage in a market headed for $150B by 2030, while EU auto chipmakers hedge Western sales weakness by deepening engagement with Chinese OEMs.
  • Automakers respond by pulling design in-house: GM's Cruise built four self-driving chips internally — including the main brains and sensor-processing silicon — for deployment by 2025, signaling that the highest-value ECUs will be designed by the car companies themselves.

Third-order effects

  • If the pattern holds, the car consolidates from dozens of federated ECUs toward fewer, more powerful compute platforms controlled by the automaker — the same centralization logic behind replacing CAN — turning the vehicle into a software product with update cycles, not a machine assembled once.
  • Regulation follows the failure mode: with software already driving a growing share of recalls, safety oversight shifts from inspecting hardware defects to auditing how quickly and reliably manufacturers can patch code in the field.

The trend: The automobile is transitioning from a mechanically sourced product to a software-defined one, with value and control migrating from parts vendors toward whoever owns the compute architecture.

Discussion

  • @magnus_s @magnus_s on x
    Will the same thing happen to real estate? ... maybe more correct to say ‘when’? #PropTech ping @antonyslumbers @drorpoleg https://twitter.com/...
  • @realgenekim Gene Kim on x
    Fascinating stats on how much of software in car will likely be built in-house vs by suppliers. Reminds me of the Wardley map that @adrianco made of fictitious autonomous driving company earlier this week! (Insourced driving module, which needed optionality, outsourced braking ht…
  • @bikehugger @bikehugger on x
    Now that I think about it, my bike has one ECU in the rear shifter. A new car averages 100 and a million lines of code. https://spectrum.ieee.org/...
  • @davewiner Dave Winer on x
    The trend toward self-driving and electric vehicles will add hundreds of millions of lines of code to cars. Can the auto industry cope? https://spectrum.ieee.org/...
  • @drorpoleg Dror on x
    Attention, real estate owners and operators. https://twitter.com/...
  • @bertrandduflos Bertrand Duflos on x
    Managing complexity: The electric/electronic stack(s), multiple ECUs, and zillions of lines of code, of modern vehicles. Very nice article. https://spectrum.ieee.org/...
  • @trengriffin Tren Griffin on x
    1/ Volkswagen Chairman Herbert Dies says, “Software will account for 90% of future innovations in the car.” ..hardly a line of software code comes from us." VW estimates that only 10% of the software in its vehicles is developed in-house. https://spectrum.ieee.org/...
  • @jamescham James Cham on x
    All over different industries, the center of gravity for business value is shifting. https://twitter.com/...
  • @azaidman Andy Zaidman on x
    Deloitte estimates that >=40% of a vehicle's development budget can be attributed to systems integration, testing, verification and validation. [...] Unsurprisingly, efficiently managing variant complexity is a significant concern for the auto industry. https://spectrum.ieee.org/…
  • @sub8u Subrahmanyam Kvj on x
    Code on wheels! Good read. “...as of 2020, Volvo has a superset of about 120 ECUs... they comprise a total of 100 Mn lines of code. This code contains 10 Mn conditional statements as well as 3 Mn functions, which are invoked some 30 Mn places in the code.” https://spectrum.ieee.o…
  • @andwor Andreas Wortmann on x
    Interesting: “Run a job assessment with all top managers at VW, Audi, Porsche, BMW, and Daimler tomorrow and ask them to code [...] if they are not able to do so, fire them immediately, because they are not fit for the job.” Former head of Audi's R&D. https://spectrum.ieee.org/..…
  • @azaidman Andy Zaidman on x
    Low-end vehicles contain 100M LOC, while high-end vehicles with advanced driver-assist systems may contain 150 electronic control units and 150M LOC. https://spectrum.ieee.org/...
  • @azaidman Andy Zaidman on x
    “Once, software was a part of the car. Now, software determines the value of a car” —Manfred Broy https://spectrum.ieee.org/...