/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Investigation: in the last five years, six EU academic institutes received tens of millions of pounds in funding from Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft

New Statesman

Context & Ripple Effects

This investigation slots into a documented pattern of Big Tech buying proximity to European power. The same four companies had already more than doubled their declared EU lobbying spend to ~$23M in just the first half of 2020, and back in 2015 Google was shown to have enlisted members of Congress it bankrolled to fight its $6bn EU antitrust case. Academic funding is a quieter instrument than either.

The scale is not unique to Europe: a separate study found [[a:1160953|58% of AI faculty at four prominent universities took money from one of 14 large tech companies]], and later reporting traced how these donations ramped up and bought influence over AI and disinformation research. What is new here is the map of which EU institutes are on the take.

First-order effects

  • Six EU academic institutes now sit inside the funding orbit of Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft, giving those firms direct financial leverage over research agendas in exactly the domains — AI, social media, disinformation — where their conduct is under scrutiny.

Second-order effects

  • The funding operates as a complement to formal influence channels: alongside the ~$23M half-year lobbying push, it builds goodwill among researchers whose work feeds the evidence base EU regulators rely on when weighing cases like the antitrust fight Google fought through bankrolled allies.

Third-order effects

  • If university funding keeps concentrating among a handful of firms, independent critical scholarship risks going the way of the EU's own €1.15B security research programme, where scrutiny was reportedly sidelined in the rush for new technology — leaving regulators judging platform behaviour using research the platforms paid for.

The trend: Big Tech is extending its capital concentration beyond products and lobbying into the academic institutions that produce the research shaping regulation of it.

Discussion

  • @markhurst Mark Hurst on x
    A study last year said non-Google searches “returned more misinformation about healthcare than Google. The authors of the pro-Google study didn't disclose any financial interests, despite [a] long-running relationship with the company.” via @dgolumbia https://www.newstatesman.com…
  • @jeremycliffe Jeremy Cliffe on x
    The influential European tech institutes funded by the very same corporate giants whose activities they are tasked with researching. Important investigation by @llaurieclarke, @kathy_swinds and @oscwilliams: https://www.newstatesman.com/ ... https://twitter.com/...
  • @ggreenwald Glenn Greenwald on x
    Google and Facebook love you and want what's best for you. That's why they censor: to help you and keep you safe. https://twitter.com/...
  • @randfish Rand Fishkin on x
    I've heard a lot of skepticism and scoffing when suggesting that Google/FB lobbied for and got what they wanted with EU laws like GDPR. One of the ways that happens is through funding of tech policy institutions, as laid out here: https://www.newstatesman.com/ ... https://twitter…
  • @jerrysaltz Jerry Saltz on x
    Guess which company has more lobbyists than any other concern in the country? Yup: Facebook. Break it up.
  • @ggreenwald Glenn Greenwald on x
    It continues to amaze me how many people are willing to cheer for Google acting as global arbiter of what views may and may not be disseminated. If you trust Silicon Valley monopolies to police discourse, it means you're not only authoritarian but foolish: it will come for you. h…