/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Experts say using period tracker apps does not necessarily put women at additional risk of prosecutions in the wake of SCOTUS overturning Roe v. Wade

Kendra Albert

Discussion

  • @emilygorcenski Emily G on x
    This is a great piece with, IMO, one very large omission: locally securing data means your data is only as secure as your phone. 4-digit PINs, fingerprint unlock, etc are totally insecure. https://zpr.io/...
  • @eff @eff on x
    Sound advice from @KendraSerra, @maggied, @eiweil: “Given the minimal risk of period tracking being used as part of a prosecution, it does not make sense for most people who find period tracking useful to stop because of Dobbs.” https://medium.com/...
  • @torproject @torproject on x
    A great article from Tor board member @KendraSerra, @maggied, & @eiweil about the digital evidence used to prosecute people in states where abortion is illegal. It's not your period tracking data, it's your texts, emails, and web history. https://medium.com/...