/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

Mastodon CEO Eugen Rochko rejected more than five Silicon Valley VC offers for “hundreds of thousands of dollars” to protect the platform's nonprofit status

Financial Times Ian Johnston

Discussion

  • Ars Technica Ian Johnston on mastodon
    Twitter rival Mastodon rejects funding to preserve nonprofit status
  • The Guardian Dan Milmo on mastodon
    Mastodon founder says investors lining up since Elon Musk's Twitter takeover
  • SiliconANGLE Mike Wheatley on mastodon
    Mastodon founder vows to preserve platform's nonprofit status
  • @atomicpoet@mastodon.social Chris Trottier on mastodon
    It's cool that @Gargron is rejecting funding from VC firms.  But this is all the more reason why Mastodon needs donations.  And not just Mastodon—everyone who's building free and open source Fediverse apps. https://arstechnica.com/...
  • @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social Jeff Jarvis on mastodon
    @Gargron turns down VC investment for Mastodon, bless him.  That's not to say that there are not investment needs & opportunities atop the Fediverse: back-end (there are already hosting services; I could see others for storage …
  • @craignewmark@mastodon.social Craig Newmark on mastodon
    @Techmeme@techhub.social Any updates re US 501c3?  Thanks!
  • @ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud @ssfckdt@mastodon.cloud on mastodon
    @djtaktix@mstdn.social @Techmeme@techhub.social The oft missed fact (by #clueless #technology #journalists) is that Rochko does not really “own” Mastodon as a service or as a piece of software. …
  • @suji_yan Suji Yan on x
    Have a lot of respect to Eugen on non-profit decision @joinmastodon . Though we chose to raise money back in the days I still think beautiful parts of cyberspace are public good and mostly funded by the people. https://twitter.com/...
  • @barbariancap @barbariancap on x
    what are the odds this goes the way other Twitter alternatives did? Twitter rival Mastodon rejects funding to protect non-profit status https://www.ft.com/...
  • @wilbanks John Wilbanks on x
    Once while I was working for a non profit in a project w a large technology company, an executive slapped the table and said “this would be so much easier if we could just buy you” Like yeah that was the point https://twitter.com/...
  • @dada_drummer Damon K on x
    Mastodon is punk rock @joinmastodon https://twitter.com/...
  • @tariqkrim @tariqkrim on x
    In the early days of the Internet, most services were academic-built, open-source, and non-profit. This is why internet tools like the web work. I wish open protocol were still part of the current culture. https://www.ft.com/...
  • @astaniscia86 Giulio S. on x
    Membership model is hard. Mastodon has >2.5 million monthly active users but only 8,500 donors. It raises just £25,000 a month. https://www.ft.com/... https://twitter.com/...
  • @martinsfp @martinsfp on x
    Haha. Mastodon keeps knocking back offers of VC cash. https://giftarticle.ft.com/...
  • @profcarroll David Carroll on x
    Investors fail to realize that the key feature of mastodon is that it can neither be bought nor yield a profit. And that's why it's so beautiful. We can have nice things! https://www.ft.com/...
  • @davewiner Dave Winer on x
    “Mastodon will not turn into everything you hate about Twitter,” said Rochko. “The fact that it can be sold to a controversial billionaire, the fact that it can be shut down, go bankrupt and so on. It's the difference in paradigms.” https://www.ft.com/...