/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

An Ada Lovelace Institute report warns that the UK's approach to AI safety lacks credibility and makes 18 recommendations for improving the government's plans

TechCrunch Natasha Lomas

Discussion

  • @halcyene Matt Davies on x
    Thrilled that our new @AdaLovelaceInst report ‘Regulating AI in the UK’ is now out in the world! 🤩 In it, we summarise the UK's plans for AI regulation — & suggest how they can be improved to ensure AI is safe & accountable. 🧵 on our findings... https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.o…
  • @adalovelaceinst @adalovelaceinst on x
    1⃣Coverage AI is being deployed and used in every sector, but the UK's diffuse legal and regulatory network for AI currently has significant gaps. Clearer rights and new institutions are needed to ensure that safeguards extend across the economy. (2/6)
  • @adalovelaceinst @adalovelaceinst on x
    2⃣Capability Regulating AI is resource-intensive and highly technical. Regulators, civil society organisations and other actors need new capabilities to properly carry out their duties. (3/6)
  • @adalovelaceinst @adalovelaceinst on x
    Our new report analyses the UK's proposals for AI regulation and makes recommendations for strengthening them across three categories, reflecting our tests for effective AI regulation: coverage, capability and urgency. 🧵(1/6) https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/ ...
  • r/technews r on reddit
    UK's approach to AI safety lacks credibility, report warns