/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

← → days · ↑ ↓ browse · Enter similar · o open

Sources: Microsoft is developing “distilled”, smaller AI models for features like Bing Chat that cost less to operate and mimic OpenAI's more advanced models

The Information Aaron Holmes

Context & Ripple Effects

Microsoft is pursuing a lower-cost layer beneath OpenAI’s advanced models for Bing Chat features, making inference economics a product-design issue rather than merely a research concern. The closely related coverage describes the same cost-cutting effort around more efficient models for Bing Chat.

The strategy sits alongside a broader push toward smaller language models: Microsoft and peers have pitched smaller models as a way to reduce training and hardware requirements. Microsoft’s later work on a large in-house model suggests it is exploring both ends of the model stack.

First-order effects

  • Microsoft can route suitable Bing Chat tasks to distilled models, lowering the operating cost of those features while retaining a path to OpenAI-class capabilities for harder requests.
  • OpenAI becomes less central to the specific Bing Chat functions that Microsoft can serve adequately with its own smaller models.

Second-order effects

  • A lower per-query cost gives Microsoft more room to expand AI features or absorb usage growth without relying exclusively on the most expensive model tier.
  • Other AI product providers face pressure to adopt model-routing and distillation approaches, competing on the cost of delivering acceptable task performance rather than model size alone.

Third-order effects

  • If this architecture proves durable, AI platforms may increasingly separate frontier-model development from mass-market serving: large models generate capabilities, while smaller specialized models deliver them economically.
  • That shift could strengthen the bargaining position of major model buyers that can develop substitutes, even as frontier models remain important for training, evaluation, and complex tasks.

The trend: Generative-AI companies are moving toward multi-model stacks in which inference cost per useful task determines which model reaches the user.

Discussion

  • @counternotions@mastodon.social @counternotions@mastodon.social on mastodon
    Embrace.  Extend.  Extinguish?  —  https://www.theinformation.com/ ...
  • @counternotions Kontra on x
    Embrace. Extend. Extinguish? https://www.theinformation.com/ ...
  • @jessicalessin Jessica Lessin on x
    Pay $10 billion for exclusive access to IP that is really expensive to run so ditch that and pay even more more to develop your own cheaper product for yourself. Welcome to the 2023 AI wars. $msft @aaronpholmes https://www.theinformation.com/ ...
  • @clementdelangue @clementdelangue on x
    I've said it and will say it again: #1 Smaller, cheaper, faster, more customized models will cover 99% of use-cases. You don't need a million dollar formula 1 to get to work everyday and you don't need a banking customer success chatbot to tell you the meaning of life! #2 All...
  • @bentossell Ben Tossell on x
    What's going on here? Microsoft wants to build its own advanced AI to reduce costs and dependence on OpenAI. What does this mean? Microsoft is directing its researchers to create conversational AI models that perform nearly as well as OpenAI's but are much smaller and cheaper...
  • @benbajarin Ben Bajarin on x
    I have no idea if this is true, but it makes sense. Lots of businesses we have talked to would prefer to pick the LLM (fine-tuned derivative) of choice that works best for them vs. locked into only one.
  • @aaronpholmes Aaron Holmes on x
    New: Microsoft is trying to kick its addiction to GPT-4. As AI costs soar, MSFT researchers are racing to build AI models from open source that mimic the quality of OpenAI software at a fraction of the cost. Some are already being used in Bing Chat: https://www.theinformation.com…