/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

A deal by the 38 OECD members that took effect on January 1 says that platforms must report users' earnings made on their services to local tax authorities

9to5Mac Ben Lovejoy

Discussion

  • @theashrb Ash on x
    It's actually sickening that HMRC are not at all bothered about tax dodgers but have all the strength for ordinary people who resell items on Vinted/eBay/Depop/etc — despite the fact that we've already paid tax (VAT) on said items 🙃 The UK is HELL if you're not rich.
  • @financedircfo Alastair Thomson on x
    I'm sure everyone who follows me is scrupulous about their tax affairs, but just in case you know a “side hustler” who isn't, this is worth a read ... BBC News - Depop, Vinted and other apps to share more information with HMRC https://www.bbc.com/...
  • @lucysiegle Lucy Siegle on x
    As usual there's an unfairness; clamping down on individuals in the sharing /reuse economy when UK government gives tax dodging fast fashion companies a free pass is problematic https://www.bbc.com/...
  • @louloumach Lou Mach on x
    So you're that skint you have to sell your old stuff to buy new stuff and the HMRC wants to tax you on the sale of something you've already paid tax on that you will be selling for less than you paid? Surely taxing millionaires would be more profitable than Sharon's used tops?