/
Navigation
Chronicles
Browse all articles
Explore
Semantic exploration
Research
Entity momentum
Nexus
Correlations & relationships
Story Arc
Topic evolution
Drift Map
Semantic trajectory animation
Posts
Analysis & commentary
Pulse API
Tech news intelligence API
Browse
Entities
Companies, people, products, technologies
Domains
Browse by publication source
Handles
Browse by social media handle
Detection
Concept Search
Semantic similarity search
High Impact Stories
Top coverage by position
Sentiment Analysis
Positive/negative coverage
Anomaly Detection
Unusual coverage patterns
Analysis
Rivalry Report
Compare two entities head-to-head
Semantic Pivots
Narrative discontinuities
Crisis Response
Event recovery patterns
Connected
Search: /
Command: ⌘K
Embeddings: large
TEXXR

Chronicles

The story behind the story

days · browse · Enter similar · o open

How a change to US tax law Section 174, forcing amortization of software labor, led to higher tax bills, less hiring, more layoffs, IP moving abroad, and more

The Pragmatic Engineer Gergely Orosz

Discussion

  • @gergelyorosz_ Gergely Orosz on threads
    Main motivation seems to be to increase tax income for the government the next 5 years to fill the gap in lost tax income caused by tax reduction for the wealthiest individuals
  • @matthausk Matthäus Krzykowski on x
    Seeing lots of circumstantial evidence in last 3 months that many, many very strong international staff at US companies have been let go. Imo this is the best hiring market in 8-9 years. Was wondering why, maybe this is one of the explanations.
  • @thetanerdy @thetanerdy on x
    Interesting read about how some easy-to-miss tax changes are affecting how smaller companies hire talented people: https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/ ...
  • @rob_rasor Rob Rasor on x
    Talk to your CPA but make note of these onerous changes. https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/ ...
  • @stephenchip Chip on x
    Will Section 174 lead to a reduction in engineering hires by US companies? Section 174 could incentivize startups to relocate outside the United States. This decision reflects a lack of practical business experience among many members of Congress. https://blog.pragmaticengineer.c…
  • @jeffreyw5000 Jeff Weinstein on x
    I had no idea about this tax change that hurts SME/bootstrapped software companies...bad bad bad! https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/ ...
  • @joshgilstrap Josh Gilstrap on x
    Seems like this will make the US less competitive in tech https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/ ...
  • @gergelyorosz Gergely Orosz on x
    A deepdive into what Section 174 means, and why this regulation staying is handcuffing the US software industry: https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/ ... [image]
  • @lutherlowe Luther Lowe on x
    An important issue flying under the radar for most. @ycombinator sent a letter to relevant Members and Senators with over 400 company signatories last Fall.
  • @ericnewcomer Eric Newcomer on x
    This tax change is crazy
  • @pragmatic_eng @pragmatic_eng on x
    A tax change rarely causes panic across the tech industry, but it's happening in the US. If Section 174 tax changes stay, the US will be one of the least desirable countries to launch tech startups. A deepdive into this important topic in today's issue: https://blog.pragmaticengi…